Better weight distribution

General Mazda MX-3 Discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
kulluminati777
Senior Member
Posts: 2509
Joined: July 11th, 2010, 11:10 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Sunny California
Contact:

Better weight distribution

Post by kulluminati777 »

Since the MX-3 has a horrible weight distribution of 65 / 35. What would you guys think i could maybe do to get it close to 50/50.I was thinking carbon hood and battery to the trunk :shrug: I know it will never be on the spot but it can be close. Or for a FWD do you think 50/50 distribution is bad? Im sure it will improve handling none the less......
View my worklog: viewtopic.php?f=46&t=77688
Image
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: Better weight distribution

Post by MrMazda92 »

Long list of stuff...

Lighter front wheels than rears? Silly, but it'd definitely change the distribution a bit, I've considered it in the past. It'd save money too, leaving stock 5 spokes on the back and throwing RPF1s or similar on the front.

Removing all non-essential systems: A/C, Power Steering, Wiper fluid reservoir, and all associated plumbing for the 3. Cruise control? I love mine, so that tiny weight difference would be a terrible trade-off for me. Let's not forget the engine crane mounts, they're easy enough to put back on, so save the 1/4 pound worth of aluminum and bolts.

Aftermarket engine mounts? Ours are heavy, some of the aftermarket/custom options could save a few pounds. Light flywheel, light(G4) crankshaft, remove excess material from the exterior of your engine, remove flashy goodies that serve no purpose other than tantalizing eye candy. Lighter weight radiator fans, these are as far forward as you can go almost, so it'd help a bit.

If you're talking about track only use, run gutted stock headlights. Old, yellowed, nasty ones will do; All you need to do is take them apart, remove as much material as you can(without touching the lense), and baking it back together.

Custom bumper support? Stocker isn't SUPER heavy, but I'm sure you could make a sturdier, lighter one for minimal cost, if you're creative.

I'm planning to grind down and sand smooth the exterior of my built KL, to shave a few extra pounds off the front end, as well as doing quite a few of the aforementioned ideas.

The sky is the limit, really...
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T + STP - 3.92 w/ LSD, JG Cam, headers, SkipShift delete, Clutch Delay Valve delete, Hurst STS, RAM Clutch Adjuster, StopTech 6 Piston Brakes, Sticky Nittos, 435 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF SC Cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MegaSquirt/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: Better weight distribution

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

At a 2500lb car, for 65/35, means that 1625lbs is over the front axle, and 875 over the rear, meaning you have to move 375 to the rear of the car to get your 50/50. The more you lighten the front, the less you need to move to the rear, but 300lbs to move is A LOT!

Mx-3's weight distribution is horrible, eh? Note that the Acura Integra and Mini Couper are known for their handling; they sit at 62/38 and 61.2/38.8 respectively. 50/50 had little benefit in a FWD car since you can't control the balance as you can in a RWD car. The rear would be very unstable and you would need to start looking into creating downforce.

Lightening the car is good. Racing series have weight limits, and they would rather lighten the car as much as possible and put the weight were they want it to improve the handling, like keeping it low and in the center of vehicle.
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
Daninski
Supporting Member
Posts: 7055
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 10:51 am
Location: Trenton ON.

Re: Better weight distribution

Post by Daninski »

Easiest fix is to date a rear seat lovin BBW. That way you keep the weight over the front for traction and balance the car all at the same time. :2thumbsup: And the new found weight should help with the tires staying hella flush as well. :lol:
2004 Subaru WRX Silver, stage 2, minty interior.
2002 Subaru WRX Blue, SOLD (best E test numbers I've ever seen)
94 MX-6. Sold
92 GS KLZE 5 Speed
96 GS 5 speed, KLZE, Sold
95 GS Minty Shape Sold
92 GS Sold
92 GS Parts Car scrapped.
Feedback viewtopic.php?f=37&t=66348" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
7477th member.

I know you believe that you understand what you think I said but I'm sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
DeadMaker
Regular Member
Posts: 457
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 12:33 pm
antispam: No
Location: Greece

Re: Better weight distribution

Post by DeadMaker »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: You have your own way to turn the topics around..
Black Mazda Mx3 Rs 1997 B6DE
cout
Regular Member
Posts: 97
Joined: March 25th, 2010, 7:54 pm
antispam: No
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: Better weight distribution

Post by cout »

kulluminati777 wrote:Since the MX-3 has a horrible weight distribution of 65 / 35. What would you guys think i could maybe do to get it close to 50/50.I was thinking carbon hood and battery to the trunk :shrug: I know it will never be on the spot but it can be close. Or for a FWD do you think 50/50 distribution is bad? Im sure it will improve handling none the less......
What kills the mx3 isn't the weight distribution so much as something like 90% of the engine is in front of the axles (at least on the V6). This means no matter what your weight distribution, you are going to have a high moment of inertia.

As other people have pointed out, a FWD car benefits from having some extra weight in the front. Among other things, this keeps weight on the driving wheels.

In our car, we've moved the battery to the center of the car, passenger side for multiple reasons: 1) our course is mostly right-hand turns and this helps keep weight close to the axis of rotation, 2) we've removed so much weight from the rear of the vehicle that we need some additional weight back there to balance things back out, and 3) most importantly, it cleans up the engine bay for when we need to get in there and fix something.

It's hard to guess what any given change will do without trying it. Go do some laps at your local course to get a baseline. Make your changes and then go back out there. If your times improve, it means that either the change was good, or you improved. Either way, it will be hard to not end up going faster.
1993 MX3 KLDE (formerly KLZE) 5spd LeMons car
KLZE 24 Hours of Lemons worklog
Post Reply

Return to “General Mazda MX-3”