V6 vs DOHC 4 cyl MX3 difference?

[edger0587]

So far my search for a decent 1994 model of the V6 MX3 has been unsuccessful. I have found several of the 1994 and 1995 4 cyl models(I want the second gen interior) .

My question to you who have experienced both, what are the differences, apart from smoothness and fuel economy?

The V6 produces more power, but it is also heavier. But that's the only thing that I can think of. And availability of parts for the 4cyl seems higher too. But I just wanted to know your opinion. Please and thank you

[wytbishop]

If you mean practical differences in terms of how it drives and what not...the big differences would be torque and fuel economy. The 1.8L makes about 20 more lb-ft if torque...which doesn't sound like much but the B6DE only makes 93lb-ft...so 20 more is more than a 20% increase. It's noticeable.

The fuel economy is not so significant. Some I4's are really efficient but I would say that the V6's and I4's are all going to be within a reasonable range.

Other than that, the suspension on the V6 is a little stiffer, the stock wheels are nicer...but they're essentially the same car.

[tdanesi]

i got the 93 v6 1.8L DOHC it is great on fuel and runs extremely smooth. No mods though. Haven't driven the 4 cylinder though..

[Nd4SpdSe]

V6 also had a lower ride height and stiffer springs and the addition of the rear tie bar. The v6 has 4-wheel disc brakes while the 4cyl uses rear drums. The V6 also had a tighter turning steering rack.

[2fazed]

Just saw a 94 V6 on Craigslist for $1k. That's if your willing to drive up to the Central Valley.

[youdirtyfox]

V6 also had a lower ride height and stiffer springs and the addition of the rear tie bar. The v6 has 4-wheel disc brakes while the 4cyl uses rear drums. The V6 also had a tighter turning steering rack.

My '98 4cyl came with rear discs

[Nd4SpdSe]

No Mx-3's here after 96

[MrMazda92]

No Mx-3's here after 96

Would've been optional before that though, eh? ;D

[wytbishop]

Nope...not here. Every MX-3 RS in existence in North America came from the factory with drums on the back AFAIK.

[edger0587]

Nope...not here. Every MX-3 RS in existence in North America came from the factory with drums on the back AFAIK.

Damn, I guess that I will have to wait until a 94 GS comes along. I can live with the less torque, but I want the sportier suspension and the better brakes. Mainly the brakes; since so many drivers around here love cutting people off I need good ones.

This kind of bothers me, even today, the subcompacts have drums on the rear. Aside from cost cutting, really what other benefits do they provide?

[edger0587]

Just saw a 94 V6 on Craigslist for $1k. That's if your willing to drive up to the Central Valley.

where? i can't seem to find it. I checked fresno, hanford, bakersfield, LA, sac, SLO, san fran

[Nd4SpdSe]

Most of the braking is done in the front anyway, but with drums, there's no way to vent any heat generated by the braking.

[youdirtyfox]

I prefer working on/replacing disc/pads
over drums anyday, but drums are supposed
to be better for handbrake turns!