Page 1 of 1

Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 24th, 2001, 2:04 am
by VizualXTC
What would happen if you didn't install an intercooler with your turbo? will it blow your engine? Thanks

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 24th, 2001, 2:06 am
by OsoSlo z28
it would overheat cause there isn't anything to lower the temp. so in the long run...it's possible

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 24th, 2001, 9:45 am
by Bri94GS
Yea...it's not something i'd recommend

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 24th, 2001, 1:40 pm
by cjthor
Well..... If you really think about it, Chevrolet used to put out the 3.8v6 with no intercooler for about four years or so. Never had a problem with it either. So it all depends on how you have it set up. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bri94GS:<BR><STRONG>Yea...it's not something i'd recommend</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 25th, 2001, 12:13 pm
by Bri94GS
It was a carbeurated engine though, wasn't it?

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 25th, 2001, 4:38 pm
by cjthor
Yes it did have a carb. The engine usually ran about 210 degrees. I had a turbo vega with a v6 and had no probs with not having an intercooler. Just didt get as much hp. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bri94GS:<BR><STRONG>It was a carbeurated engine though, wasn't it?</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 26th, 2001, 9:47 am
by Bri94GS
The reason they put turbos in some of those cars is to make up for displacement or engine size. Instead of throwing a v8 in there, they put a turbo 6....you could run a turbo with no intercooler, but if you're going to use the turbo for performance, or run a lot of boost, you should def. have one big enough to keep things cool

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: October 31st, 2001, 10:37 am
by RanMan
Most companies use the turbo to get the best of both worlds. On one hand, you can have a small engine (easy to put into small cars and it also weighs less) which gives you great MPG. Yet at the same time, using a turbo, will give you more power (also does not take up much space...and does not weigh much). So turbocharging a small engine is a better alternative for car makers than using a larger engine.

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: November 3rd, 2001, 6:09 pm
by Bri94GS
Having a smaller engine usually gives the car a cheaper insurance rate too...making it appeal more to some buyers...v6's are a lot cheaper than 8's on insurance

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: November 4th, 2001, 2:43 am
by MX3RS
The basic idea of an intercooler is to cool the intake temp since when the turbo compresses the air it also heats it. HEAT=BAD=POWERLOSS. By cooling the ambient intake temp it allows you to run a higher boost pressure without causing detonation.

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Posted: November 30th, 2001, 5:25 pm
by renef
Without the IC, the turbo is limited in power to avoid overheating.<P>It's a common thing to have cars run without an IC. It's veray easy to add even a small one.<P>Makes a HUGE difference in power.<P>RF