Turbo w/o Intercooler

A Forum For All Forced Induction Systems Topics Such As Turbos, Superchargers and Nitrous Oxide.
Post Reply
VizualXTC
Regular Member
Posts: 1833
Joined: June 25th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Ogden, UT, USA

Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by VizualXTC »

What would happen if you didn't install an intercooler with your turbo? will it blow your engine? Thanks
~Ryan~

1994 MX-3 GS Teal
Stock V6 with insane potential
1987 Toyota Pickup
SR5 Xtracab Turbo

--The slow wait until the green light, while the FAST already left when the red went out--

--Sex should be like driving a Honda....slow, obscene, and loud enough for the neighbors to hear--
ImageImage
OsoSlo z28
Senior Member
Posts: 2334
Joined: September 17th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL, U.S.

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by OsoSlo z28 »

it would overheat cause there isn't anything to lower the temp. so in the long run...it's possible
Fast imports only come on two wheels.
"MR." Ashley Fowler
'02 Yamaha Warrior (1700cc)
'94 MX-3 RS-t (BPT)~ sold
cardomain pics
Bri94GS
Regular Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: February 13th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Hartford, CT
Contact:

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by Bri94GS »

Yea...it's not something i'd recommend
~Bri - Morph860@aol.com
'94 MX-3 GS (FOR SALE!)
'04 Mazda 3s 5-door
zoom-zoom
User avatar
cjthor
Forum Moderator
Posts: 5018
Joined: November 26th, 2000, 2:01 am
Location: Portland Oregon
Contact:

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by cjthor »

Well..... If you really think about it, Chevrolet used to put out the 3.8v6 with no intercooler for about four years or so. Never had a problem with it either. So it all depends on how you have it set up. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bri94GS:<BR><STRONG>Yea...it's not something i'd recommend</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Jarid Perry
94 mx3 Turrrbooooo (not even close to stock) 302WHP
71 Chevy C20 (tow rig!!)
77 Jeep CJ5 (no way its stock)
06 MINI Cooper S JCW GP (few goodies) 210WHP
2008 MINI Cooper Clubman S
Bri94GS
Regular Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: February 13th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Hartford, CT
Contact:

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by Bri94GS »

It was a carbeurated engine though, wasn't it?
~Bri - Morph860@aol.com
'94 MX-3 GS (FOR SALE!)
'04 Mazda 3s 5-door
zoom-zoom
User avatar
cjthor
Forum Moderator
Posts: 5018
Joined: November 26th, 2000, 2:01 am
Location: Portland Oregon
Contact:

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by cjthor »

Yes it did have a carb. The engine usually ran about 210 degrees. I had a turbo vega with a v6 and had no probs with not having an intercooler. Just didt get as much hp. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bri94GS:<BR><STRONG>It was a carbeurated engine though, wasn't it?</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Jarid Perry
94 mx3 Turrrbooooo (not even close to stock) 302WHP
71 Chevy C20 (tow rig!!)
77 Jeep CJ5 (no way its stock)
06 MINI Cooper S JCW GP (few goodies) 210WHP
2008 MINI Cooper Clubman S
Bri94GS
Regular Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: February 13th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Hartford, CT
Contact:

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by Bri94GS »

The reason they put turbos in some of those cars is to make up for displacement or engine size. Instead of throwing a v8 in there, they put a turbo 6....you could run a turbo with no intercooler, but if you're going to use the turbo for performance, or run a lot of boost, you should def. have one big enough to keep things cool
~Bri - Morph860@aol.com
'94 MX-3 GS (FOR SALE!)
'04 Mazda 3s 5-door
zoom-zoom
RanMan
Regular Member
Posts: 419
Joined: July 23rd, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Lake Worth, TX USA

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by RanMan »

Most companies use the turbo to get the best of both worlds. On one hand, you can have a small engine (easy to put into small cars and it also weighs less) which gives you great MPG. Yet at the same time, using a turbo, will give you more power (also does not take up much space...and does not weigh much). So turbocharging a small engine is a better alternative for car makers than using a larger engine.
Bri94GS
Regular Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: February 13th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Hartford, CT
Contact:

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by Bri94GS »

Having a smaller engine usually gives the car a cheaper insurance rate too...making it appeal more to some buyers...v6's are a lot cheaper than 8's on insurance
~Bri - Morph860@aol.com
'94 MX-3 GS (FOR SALE!)
'04 Mazda 3s 5-door
zoom-zoom
MX3RS
Regular Member
Posts: 75
Joined: November 16th, 2000, 2:01 am
Location: Des Moines, IA

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by MX3RS »

The basic idea of an intercooler is to cool the intake temp since when the turbo compresses the air it also heats it. HEAT=BAD=POWERLOSS. By cooling the ambient intake temp it allows you to run a higher boost pressure without causing detonation.
renef
Regular Member
Posts: 151
Joined: December 29th, 2000, 2:01 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: Turbo w/o Intercooler

Post by renef »

Without the IC, the turbo is limited in power to avoid overheating.<P>It's a common thing to have cars run without an IC. It's veray easy to add even a small one.<P>Makes a HUGE difference in power.<P>RF
White 1992 MX-3 RS Turbo<BR>"Live Boosted or Die!"
Post Reply

Return to “Forced Induction”