Anyone ever heard of Mazda MX-6 ???

[DfS]

Hey guys,<p>anyone ever heard of Mazda MX-6 ? Because I found one for sale, it's an Mazda MX-6 1993 V6 24v 180HP, complete (leather seats/interior, etc), the guy wants like the same price you pay for an Mazda MX-3 1.6 16v 1997, what you guys think ? You guys think the mx-6 or the mx-3 is more beauty ? give me some opinions please.<p>Thanks

[millionflame]

Yes, we've heard of the MX-6. Why wouldn't we?<p>Unless that guy has an engine swap (probably KL-ZE) then he wont have 180 hp, since the V6 version of the MX6 puts out around 150 hp or so.<p>Personally, the MX-6 looks nice for a "family car" but it's definately NOT a sports car, like some would say.<p>I'd still pick the MX-3 over it any day. Better looks, lighter, faster, and it's a real sports car.<p>~A

[hotsiit]

hey DfS....Well, before i got my MX-3 i had a 93 MX-6. I liked it alot, had full power, ac, and it looked good. Sadly the one i had was a 4cyl auto, and mine was very, very Un-reliable. the mx-6 spent about every other week in the shop because it constatnly broke down. I love the styling of both the mx-3 and the mx-6...so, id say go with the one you like more. From a biased point of view, go with the MX-3 .....ok, hope this helped, maybe

[johnnyb]

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Aiden:

Unless that guy has an engine swap (probably KL-ZE) then he wont have 180 hp, since the V6 version of the MX6 puts out around 150 hp or so.<p><hr></blockquote><p>
the north american mx-6 came with lower hp. As far as I know everywhere else came with more hp

[torpedan]

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr> I'd still pick the MX-3 over it any day. Better looks, lighter, faster, and it's a real sports car.<p> <hr></blockquote><p>faster? yeah the Mx-6 is faster.. Prolly has better aftermarket support to.. Once you start to do serious work though a Mx-3 can beat the crud out of it namely cause you can use the same V6 powertrain and are lighter

[BumpNGlow]

how much do "97" MX-3s go for?? Never seen one........

[millionflame]

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by torpedan:
<p>faster? yeah the Mx-6 is faster.. Prolly has better aftermarket support to.. Once you start to do serious work though a Mx-3 can beat the crud out of it namely cause you can use the same V6 powertrain and are lighter<hr></blockquote><p>Well I kinda figured he would have guessed that anyways.<p>I don't think you could call the MX-6 a sports car.<p>~A

[gmuffb]

I really don't think that the mx-6 is a "family car". I'm 4'11'' and i can't even fit in the back seat of those things. I think it's best compared to a ford probe (maybe cause they're basically the same thing). I would have to say that the main difference (other than style) would be that is a better fit if you're tall. All in all, it's a mazda . I say go for it.

[Len-Dogg]

You've never seen a 97 mx-3 because they stopped making them in 96.

[OsoSlo z28]

the v6 mx6 came with 170hp. if it's a manual tranny, i'd get it.

[Custommx3]

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by cre8v mx3:
the v6 mx6 came with 170hp. if it's a manual tranny, i'd get it.<hr></blockquote><p>164 actually

[Custommx3]

and the 4cl is a <p>2.0L 118 hp I4

[Manach]

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Len-Dogg:
You've never seen a 97 mx-3 because they stopped making them in 96.<hr></blockquote><p>Europe had 97..<p>http://www.mx-3.com/history/<p>98 is the last year from Japan..<p>[ May 09, 2003: Message edited by: Manach ]</p>

[millionflame]

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by gmuffb:
I really don't think that the mx-6 is a "family car". I'm 4'11'' and i can't even fit in the back seat of those things. I think it's best compared to a ford probe (maybe cause they're basically the same thing). I would have to say that the main difference (other than style) would be that is a better fit if you're tall. All in all, it's a mazda . I say go for it.<hr></blockquote><p>I've always considered it a "sporty" family car, since it has two doors, but isn't a sports car.<p>I'm pretty sure that it's listed as that on insurance and blue book type stuff.<p>And it's no better fit than an MX-3 either. I'm 6'4" and I fit in the MX-3 just fine.<p>~A

[torpedan]

Never really got to drive a mx-6 yet but yeah i really wouldnt call it a family car. for most insurance polices any two door car is considered a sports car.