In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

V6 Technical/Performance Discussions
IanL
Supporting Member
Posts: 1394
Joined: June 13th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: UK

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by IanL »

Originally posted by UrBaNsTyLe55:
... as for ecu if the k8 ecu dumps alot of fuel shouldn't the kl dump even more, i'm using the kl ecu and haven't had a rich problem
I think Vicious means you have to use the K8 ECU with a VAF, not a MAF.

Its a fallacy that an ECU from a larger engine will provide more fuel in a given situation. The fuel delivery depends on the measured airflow, not the engine displacement.

If you use an airflow measurement device for which the ECU is not calibrated, it won't provide the correct amount of fuel.
Re-shaped and re-sized gearshift lever. Best driveability mod you can do!
Extra thick soundproofing in the boot (trunk) to quieten my stainless steel exhaust system :)
User avatar
mxmaz
Regular Member
Posts: 1116
Joined: May 4th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Canada

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by mxmaz »

what would be the best ecu/vaf to go with?
User avatar
Custommx3
Site Administrator
Posts: 8391
Joined: November 7th, 2000, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Lat 35.1N Lon -90W
Contact:

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by Custommx3 »

Your stock vaf(Je50), Kf15 ECU.
hqpc
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: July 10th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by hqpc »

Dam you guys are smart!!
User avatar
mxmaz
Regular Member
Posts: 1116
Joined: May 4th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Canada

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by mxmaz »

If i put the millenia IM on my kfze without portmatching will i still see much of a gain? or would i just be better off with the klde manifold?
Mnemonic
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3415
Joined: September 3rd, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Eastern Hemisphere
Contact:

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by Mnemonic »

klde manifold would be better choice you can distrupt air flow by making it hit from a bigger port to a smaller
08 Infiniti G37s 6speed (The Daily)
Stillen Cold Air Intake, Z1 Plenum Power Mod, Z1 Headers, Z1 Test Pipe, OBX (Ark) Exhaust, Up-Rev Osiris Engine Management (Tuned at Z1), 20x9" 20x10" Str Racing Concave Staggered Rims, SPC Camber kit, Tein H Techs Springs

01 Lexus Is300 (LS2 Project)
93 Mx3 SE 2.5 KLZE (sold it)
93 Mx3 GS 2.0 KFZE (killed it)
lakersfan1
Senior Member
Posts: 3825
Joined: June 26th, 2003, 2:01 am
Location: Puyallup, WA

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by lakersfan1 »

Originally posted by mxmaz:
If i put the millenia IM on my kfze without portmatching will i still see much of a gain? or would i just be better off with the klde manifold?
You'd want to get a KLDE phenolic spacer set and use a dremel to flare it from DE runner shape on one end to ZE runner shape on the opther side.
bubba_03
Regular Member
Posts: 263
Joined: February 2nd, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: dunn NC

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by bubba_03 »

FOR ALL OF YOU KFZE MOTOR BUFFS, I HAVE 6 CUSTOM MADE CROWER CONNECTING RODS THAT ARE BRAND NEW AND I DONT NEED THEM ANYMORE BECAUSE I WENT TO TURBO A KF-ZE BUT IT WAS CHEAPER JUST TO DO A KLZE RATHER THEN TURBO, SO THEY UP FOR GRABS AND SINCE I CANT FIND ANY BUYERS FOR THEM I'LL SELL THEM FOR 325 SHIPPED! JUST PM ME IF ANYONE IS INTERESTED.
User avatar
tatsu
Regular Member
Posts: 229
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Abbotsford, BC

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by tatsu »

One other thing to consider: apparently, the 2.0L and 2.5L V6 motors available in some models of the Suzuki Vitara/Chevrolet Tracker was based on the K-series motors. I am 99% sure they use the same bore and stroke, and quite likely the same block/head castings, as these are the most expensive parts for a manufacturer to have tooling made for.

As a result, there may be some degree of parts compatibility (E.G. head gaskets, piston rings, water pumps) between those motors and ours. The VERY good thing about that, if it is the case, is that Suzuki still sold vehicles with that motor here in North America until last year (the 2003 model year - they have moved up to a 2.5L this year), so parts should be plentiful!

Anyone with a KF rebuild underway willing to see if some Suzuki parts will fit?

<small>[ October 20, 2004, 09:58 AM: Message edited by: JP ]</small>
User avatar
Custommx3
Site Administrator
Posts: 8391
Joined: November 7th, 2000, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Lat 35.1N Lon -90W
Contact:

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by Custommx3 »

Where did u get that info. Ford owns mazda by a large percentage, I dont believe they would share engine platforms with their major competitor...
User avatar
Custommx3
Site Administrator
Posts: 8391
Joined: November 7th, 2000, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Lat 35.1N Lon -90W
Contact:

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by Custommx3 »

I also checked the input on the head side of my KFZE and the runner opening on a KLDE Intake mani, the KLDE is slightly bigger by a few milometers. Its actually better to disrupt the airflow in that direction as opposed to the runners being smaller than the head side.
User avatar
Custommx3
Site Administrator
Posts: 8391
Joined: November 7th, 2000, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Lat 35.1N Lon -90W
Contact:

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by Custommx3 »

Doing a little research, the 2.0L in a tracker was a 4cl.
A 127-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine

the v6 was a 2.5L, but not the Mazda motor. It only had 155 hp as well.
<img src="http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_im ... 5_full.jpg" alt=" - " />
Thats not a mazda v6.

<small>[ October 20, 2004, 11:31 AM: Message edited by: Custommx3 ]</small>
User avatar
tatsu
Regular Member
Posts: 229
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Abbotsford, BC

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by tatsu »

That is incorrect (at least for Suzuki). I used to work for a Suzuki dealer - the 2.0L V6 sold in some 4-door Sidekick/Vitaras and 4-Door Trackers is definitely K-series based, at least mechanically.

The FI and other engine electronics are different, as is (obviously) the intake, the valve covers and several other ancillary bits, but the block and its internals are, supposedly, based on the Mazda K-Series, and in fact may be identical.

The difference in HP between the 2.5L in the Vitara and the K-series can be attributed to different cams, different FI and intake, etc.
Gro Harlem
Senior Member
Posts: 3391
Joined: November 30th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Stuttgart, Deutschland
Contact:

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by Gro Harlem »

yup, i've read that too. KFDE's i think are available state-side, not sure of their power rating.

I am not sure what years they came in the suzukis...i believe it was the newer "grand vitara" models, not the old sidekicks which had G-series 4cyl suzuki motors (which are actually pretty damn good)
Noble Green Metallic 93' GS Hybrid, 91' 1.8 323
DONATE TO MX-3.COM
User avatar
tatsu
Regular Member
Posts: 229
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Abbotsford, BC

Re: In-depth discussion on KF-ZE

Post by tatsu »

I'm not 100% sure, but I believe there was one year when the four-door Vitara (Sidekick) was available with the KF-based 2.0L V6 - it was kind of a transitional year for Suzuki, when they first brought the Vitara nameplate to North America. After that, it was available only in the Grand Vitara, which has now gone to a 2.5L for the 2004 model year.

I believe the power rating on the 2.0L was 135 hp or so, with about 130 ft-lbs of torque. It did have a non-ZE-like compression ratio of 9.5:1, so again, the difference in power was probably due to differences in exhaust, intake, FI and other electronics.
Post Reply

Return to “V6 Technical/Performance”