difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

V6 Technical/Performance Discussions
User avatar
marcdh
Regular Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: July 26th, 2006, 3:54 pm
Location: Belfast -Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by marcdh »

I have had both manifolds on my kl31 cammed ZE, I/H/E, port and polish and the probinator setup for the curved neck. I know that's an unfair test, but the straightneck was over .5 sec slower 0-60, VRIS aside that's alot. I'm sticking with the curved neck for now.
AZ-3 1498cc Turbo! EVO 8 turbo and manifold, 5 stud swap, SSR Type C, DIYPNP seq Megasquirt
Mx-3 2.5 V6 Turbo 291 BHP 251 lbft @ 8psi - Retired due to rust and back at uni
View Worklog
Image
Slammed6
Regular Member
Posts: 965
Joined: January 14th, 2005, 5:34 am
Location: Oxnard, California

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by Slammed6 »

A shop tested both Straight neck and Curve neck ZE manifolds on a flow bench. The Curve neck flowed like 10 CFM more than the Straight neck. The Curve neck shows the most power increase over the straight neck through low-mid RPM range.

I had a KL-31 cammed KLZE, with Curve neck manifold, Stock MX-3 air box, Headers, 2.5" Cat-back, and KL-36 ECU. I Dyno'd 180 WHP, which is more than most people dyno with stand alones. I think from all my reading on these forums that is one of the highest, if not the highest, WHP on a factory ECU.
***D-Tuned Custom KL MX-3 on Nitrous***
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by wytbishop »

So far I'm not totally happy with the performance of my Probinator chipped K801 ECU. I'm not getting great mileage and when the exhaust is done it's likely to get worse. The power seems decent, and I'm sure it will improve noticeably with the exhaust, but I don't think i'll have 180 on the ground.

I think I'm in the market for a KL36 ECU.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
colinf004
Regular Member
Posts: 162
Joined: August 31st, 2008, 12:40 pm
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Contact:

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by colinf004 »

I have also been doing a lot of reading on these forums in the past few weeks, with the information I have read, I have come up with a solution I would like to have under my hood. 1st off I have 2 KLDE engines and 1 of them is a rebuilt klde engine, kl01 cams, 3deg heads, new exhaust headers, de IM and other small mods..
I am now seeking a curved neck KLZE, take the heads off both ZE and the DE, swap the DE retainers into the ZE, port and do a 3deg on the heads.. for the internals on thats engine.. I am a little fuzy on the kl31, kl01 cams, not sure what I want to do... should I do others internals like, pistons, rods? (might not do a turbo)
once all done sell the remaining DE parts, Need the room.. through in a catback exhaust and poly those engine mounts.
I currently have a kl36 ecu installed

not too sure what a megasquirt does and how it works.. whats up with the extra nipple on the dist. and a coil pack I have seen in pictures. whats that do??

all in all does my ZE requirements make sense?? will I be pushing 200WHP? or close to it?
User avatar
marcdh
Regular Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: July 26th, 2006, 3:54 pm
Location: Belfast -Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by marcdh »

wytbishop wrote:So far I'm not totally happy with the performance of my Probinator chipped K801 ECU. I'm not getting great mileage and when the exhaust is done it's likely to get worse. The power seems decent, and I'm sure it will improve noticeably with the exhaust, but I don't think i'll have 180 on the ground.

I think I'm in the market for a KL36 ECU.
x2 runs far too rich on WOT. I got megasquirt to try and sort that out, pity it doesn't frickn work.
AZ-3 1498cc Turbo! EVO 8 turbo and manifold, 5 stud swap, SSR Type C, DIYPNP seq Megasquirt
Mx-3 2.5 V6 Turbo 291 BHP 251 lbft @ 8psi - Retired due to rust and back at uni
View Worklog
Image
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by wytbishop »

The theoretical power rating of the ZE engine is 198hp. So it probably puts 160ish to the ground in the majority of cases. The only way to make more power is to increase volumetric efficiency. That means get more air in and out of the engine. Improving the intake and exhaust is the easiest and most common way tot do that, but it will probably only get you 10hp. That being said I'm sure that there are guys out there putting 200 on the ground. These are the guys chasing every little gain. Knife edging the IM, boring the TB, flowing the heads, 3 angle valve grind and on and on.

No combination of heads, cams, valves, etc. will increase your engine's output beyond 170-180hp or so. I would call 180whp the best case scenario without some sort of in depth search for added hp. If you're doing the internals, you coupld bump compression but that would hamper future boosting efforts.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Juans_93_MX3
Senior Member
Posts: 2220
Joined: October 17th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: SLC, Utah

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by Juans_93_MX3 »

I got a question for everyone.

I own a straight neck. I am surprised that the curved neck engines make just as much power as a straight neck according to http://www.geocities.com/viv95pgt/klze.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I thought the whole point into getting the straight neck KLZE was because you can swap the manifold and you can already have a set of KL31 CAMs... so whats the point of having KL31 cams if they make just as much power as KL01 CAMs?

How much power are KL31s suppose to make over KL01 CAMs?
2008 Mazda 3
1993 MX3 GS
KLZE, Fidanza flywheel, KL31 CAMs, South Bend Stage I Clutch, Pacesetter STS, SS AutoChromes, Magnaflow muffler, 2.25' Exhaust, CAI, Blaster Coil HEI, KLDE Valvetrain, 5 Speed Swap
RX8SE3P
Regular Member
Posts: 912
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 8:11 am

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by RX8SE3P »

Not sure. That site says the curved neck engine can make 200HP. Dunno if it's entirely true, perhaps it has to be a Jap spec curved neck.

I know the curved neck motors in the Eunos 800 here only make 125KW -170HP. They look exactly the same. They use the same cams. I'm not sure how they make 200HP when they seem identical in every way to the 170HP engine?

Mind you, before anyone jumps at this, the Australian spec Eunos 800 does indeed use the same spark plugs as my straight neck ZE. Obviously pistons are the same.
1995 Eunos 30x KLZE
Worklog
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

Juans_93_MX3 wrote:I got a question for everyone.

I own a straight neck. I am surprised that the curved neck engines make just as much power as a straight neck according to http://www.geocities.com/viv95pgt/klze.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I thought the whole point into getting the straight neck KLZE was because you can swap the manifold and you can already have a set of KL31 CAMs... so whats the point of having KL31 cams if they make just as much power as KL01 CAMs?

How much power are KL31s suppose to make over KL01 CAMs?
See where the power is made, not the amount of power made
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
ninjajim4
Regular Member
Posts: 1163
Joined: December 18th, 2004, 2:01 am

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by ninjajim4 »

+1... i've never heard it said that a straight neck make more HP than a curve neck, only shifts the powerband. the only advantage i've ever heard of is that the kl31/36 ECUs are designed for straight necks and so using a curve neck throws off the VRIS points a little.
Slammed6
Regular Member
Posts: 965
Joined: January 14th, 2005, 5:34 am
Location: Oxnard, California

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by Slammed6 »

Juans_93_MX3 wrote:I got a question for everyone.

I own a straight neck. I am surprised that the curved neck engines make just as much power as a straight neck according to http://www.geocities.com/viv95pgt/klze.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I thought the whole point into getting the straight neck KLZE was because you can swap the manifold and you can already have a set of KL31 CAMs... so whats the point of having KL31 cams if they make just as much power as KL01 CAMs?

How much power are KL31s suppose to make over KL01 CAMs?
The power increase is made through the intake manifold, from what i remember reading. So that is why putting a curve neck manifold on a KLZE with KL-31 cams is suppose to make more power.

I said in another post the Curve neck manifold out flows the straight neck by a long shot through mid RPMs, and in upper RPMs it was shown to flow slightly better.

I also remember there was a big bebate on KL-01 stamped KLZE cams being the same SPEC as the KL-31 stamped KLZE cams...but i never really believed that.
***D-Tuned Custom KL MX-3 on Nitrous***
User avatar
Tommy
Junior Member
Posts: 29
Joined: March 30th, 2009, 1:14 am

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by Tommy »

RX8SE3P wrote:I had a big arguement with custommx3 about this one, my opinion is that while the curved neck is closer to a ZE than it is to a DE, it's still not as powerful.

The curved neck engine is out of millenias, I think. I know they come out of Eunos 800s here, is that the same car as a millenia? Australia uses weird names, our MX3 is called a 30x.... I've seen engine bays of 2.5L Eunos 800s and they are the curved neck engine. They are rated for 170HP, 125KW. I've read this from my insurance car guides site. It's also widely posted in other places that the curved neck engine has 170HP.

They use the same spark plugs as a ZE. This to me means they might have the same pistons too. I've noted that DE spark plugs are much longer than ZE ones. The Eunos 800 definitely uses ZE spark plugs. However it is tuned for regular octane petrol. The curved neck engine uses KL01 cams. Same from the DE. These keep torque in the lower revs a little better but it doesn't peak with power like the straight neck.

IMO the TRUE ZE is the straight neck engine. I like to call it the KL31 engine. The KL31 has KL31 cams, KL31 heads, KL31 ECU, KL31 throttle body, KL31 pretty much everything! It's tuned for higher octane petrol. It makes 200HP, 149KW.

Now I know that you can use either intake manifold and it won't affect you but I am pretty sure the curved neck engine in general is not as fast as the KL31 straight neck.


Your referring to the KLG4 with the curved neck in the millenias and i also think there weak but it also was a ATX o well
User avatar
Tommy
Junior Member
Posts: 29
Joined: March 30th, 2009, 1:14 am

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by Tommy »

wytbishop wrote:The theoretical power rating of the ZE engine is 198hp. So it probably puts 160ish to the ground in the majority of cases. The only way to make more power is to increase volumetric efficiency. That means get more air in and out of the engine. Improving the intake and exhaust is the easiest and most common way tot do that, but it will probably only get you 10hp. That being said I'm sure that there are guys out there putting 200 on the ground. These are the guys chasing every little gain. Knife edging the IM, boring the TB, flowing the heads, 3 angle valve grind and on and on.

No combination of heads, cams, valves, etc. will increase your engine's output beyond 170-180hp or so. I would call 180whp the best case scenario without some sort of in depth search for added hp. If you're doing the internals, you coupld bump compression but that would hamper future boosting efforts.

160ish ZE????? damn you might as well stick with a DE rated @ 164-170
RX8SE3P
Regular Member
Posts: 912
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 8:11 am

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by RX8SE3P »

Tommy wrote:Your referring to the KLG4 with the curved neck in the millenias and i also think there weak but it also was a ATX o well
Is it a KLG4?? I've never heard of that. They are meant to have 125KW, more power than a DE - 121KW.

Here's an engine bay pic. They look just like "curved neck ZE". How would you tell this apart from a 200HP curved neck? They look identical. Head codes are probably the same too. Would the cams be KL31? I guess if it was a ZE version it would have a 7 nipple disty and no EGR etc.

Here's a pics, they are found in Eunos 800

Image
Image
1995 Eunos 30x KLZE
Worklog
User avatar
Mooneggs
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6128
Joined: August 10th, 2005, 10:08 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Contact:

Re: difference in klze curve neck vs. straight neck.

Post by Mooneggs »

Tommy wrote:160ish ZE????? damn you might as well stick with a DE rated @ 164-170
we're talking power at the wheels not the crank... 200hp ZE puts out about 160-165 at the wheel normally
Post Reply

Return to “V6 Technical/Performance”