Page 1 of 1

Engines: Interference or non-interference?

Posted: January 11th, 2009, 9:06 pm
by Leedeth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda_B_engine" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Mazda B engines are said to be non-interference on Wikipedia, is this true?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda_K_engine" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Are Mazda K engine interference or non-interference?

I need to be absolutely sure, because I don't want to be risking timing belt breakage if it's an interference engine, and at the same time I don't want to be wasting money on a timing belt change if it's a non-interference engine.

Thanks.

Re: Engines: Interference or non-interference?

Posted: January 11th, 2009, 9:06 pm
by onlytrueromeo
Both are non interference, if your belt is broken you will have no internal engine damage.

Re: Engines: Interference or non-interference?

Posted: January 12th, 2009, 12:48 am
by boosted_bullet
unlike my dam eclipse... [ :evil: ]

Re: Engines: Interference or non-interference?

Posted: January 12th, 2009, 12:51 am
by wytbishop
The only risk of valve damage is if the belt broke at very high rpm. Even then its unlikely that the valve could float high enough to contact the piston.

Re: Engines: Interference or non-interference?

Posted: January 15th, 2009, 10:16 pm
by mx3boyze
boosted_bullet wrote:unlike my dam eclipse... [ :evil: ]
Lol, My friend and I tore down his eclipse to find bent valves. He abused that car and was so mad because I am worse on everything I own and havent had an engine go on me yet. But I beleive 14psi is going to finish off the ZE in a short while.

Re: Engines: Interference or non-interference?

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 6:09 pm
by boosted_bullet
ouch thats sucks!

re-build??