MX-3.com

I sometimes will say something like, "Civics are too common" but other than that I dont mostly because I have no right to bash on Civics or Hondas unless I owned something like a GSX Eclipse or a Mustang.

I only bash on the ones that are 4 different colors w/ a huge wing and a fart can on the back of them.. And then I am not really bashing the car.. just the dork driving it

Tunes67

ya mostly do, but on drivers usually since its their ego that makes for most of honda's reputation. They think theyre indestructable, invincible etc.

I bash on Hondas constantly but I do it just to be mean.

most of my friends own Hondas so I have to bite my lip

Nope.
Because i would love to build a boosted h23/h22 frankenstein. put it into a hatch and run 11's.

nos92mx3 wrote:Nope.
Because i would love to build a boosted h23/h22 frankenstein. put it into a hatch and run 11's.

b16 would be better or go b18c2 if you can afford it

Eh theres no replacement for displacement.
I would build a k24a but im not quite sure of the aftermarket support for the engine.

nos92mx3 wrote:Eh theres no replacement for displacement.
I would build a k24a but im not quite sure of the aftermarket support for the engine.

For real and I along with other V6 owners are getting it up the butt, we have to put up with a crappy 1.8L V6
If you want displacement, get a V8.

EDIT: I forgot to also mention that I dont bash on them because my car isnt any better as far as the 1/4 mile goes and reliability

I bash on them all the time....espaecially those stupid 7th gen civics. Around here its a ratio of 2:1 for those cars vs. any other car.

I agree with tunes

I usually don't bash Hondas because I own one but I will bash on any car that looks like a special ed guy built it but usually I bash on the people driving the car because they are the jackass not the car, unless its a neon or cavalier they just suck.

i dont like hondas, never have never will.

Wow, Juan you are an ignorant fool.

Sure V8's are known for displacement hell who would want a 2 litre v8? No one, But since were not talking about a v8, what would you rather have, A turbocharged 1.6/1.8 litre, or a boosted 2.3/2.4 litre. Ill take the 2.3/2.4 anyday, sure the 1.6/1.8 will rev alot higher Safer, because of the less rotational mass and stress on the rods etc etc. But say if your using the same turbocharger on both cars not only is the 2.3/2.4 going to make more power its going to do so quicker. Because it is taking in and exhausting more air.

If you would like to argue over this feel free to pm me, i dont want to waste any more bandwidth on a topic that has been covered before.

DavidOS wrote:i dont like hondas, never have never will.

I wouldn't go about it that far. If you are looking for a stock reliable car and is going to keep it that way, then I could see getting a honda. But besides that honda's suck. Gas milage and value are the only things they are good for. But when you can get 40mpg out of a stock 4 cyl MX-3 get the 3!

And I bash Honda's all day long cause about every 30 secs I see another riced out one while driving...