Page 2 of 3
Posted: July 3rd, 2006, 12:44 pm
by Juans_93_MX3
Actually, the 5.0s should run low 15s high 14s but with a 3.73, it should cut the time by anywhere from .4 to .5.
As for the 96-98 models
They are slower. Slowest Mustangs in years
Posted: July 3rd, 2006, 4:00 pm
by Juans_93_MX3
http://www.mx-3.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.ph ... &&start=15
Most of these guys on this thread are reporting a average of mid 14s
Some with low 14s
People running everything stock except the engine are running high 14s, low 15s
Posted: July 4th, 2006, 6:02 pm
by wagZE
14.9 is what i got with one of these
http://www.gtechpro.com/
Posted: July 4th, 2006, 6:49 pm
by JWMX3
what does a 2004 SVT supercharged Cobra run ?
Posted: July 6th, 2006, 11:13 pm
by slimmyslim1420
The 04 SVT Mustang should run 12.9 @ 112 thats from car and driver. And 0-60 in 4.6
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons ... page3.html
Posted: July 12th, 2006, 4:02 am
by BuGS
BTW a guy in MX-west ( 3 -4 yrs back) had a ZE with a 100shot and was running 12's. I have his old set of Nitto Drag Radials...
Posted: July 12th, 2006, 10:44 am
by babyblueMX3
man guys this topics has been debated lots of time before.
Make a search for drag boards and you'll come up with some times the guys made a few years back
Posted: August 2nd, 2006, 11:49 pm
by Teqnyck
I've been wondering what you run, babyblue
Posted: August 3rd, 2006, 7:54 am
by babyblueMX3
Teqnyck wrote:I've been wondering what you run, babyblue
I was running a klze fully built turboed on 20psi. I managed to score the 6 pistons because the valve was hitting the pistons, wrong desigh by the guys I purcharse the pistons too. Since then I sold everything because it costs too much to put everything back together.
I WAS fast though hehehe
Posted: August 15th, 2006, 2:02 am
by Slammed6
BuGS wrote:BTW a guy in MX-west ( 3 -4 yrs back) had a ZE with a 100shot and was running 12's. I have his old set of Nitto Drag Radials...
I was running 12's with a Stock ZE I/H/E and a 75-shot....my car is now coming back out with lots of new things including cams and a 100 shot and LSD Diff...so lets see what i can get now.
Posted: August 15th, 2006, 7:38 am
by Bochek
babyblueMX3 wrote:Teqnyck wrote:
I WAS fast though hehehe
how fast is fast?
Posted: August 15th, 2006, 8:57 am
by babyblueMX3
Bochek wrote:babyblueMX3 wrote:Teqnyck wrote:
I WAS fast though hehehe
how fast is fast?
can't really describe, but from 80 to 120 km/h, it took me around 2.5 sec.
Posted: August 18th, 2006, 1:23 am
by fieromx3
a mx3 DE and ZE times are really slow at really slow MPH
Posted: August 27th, 2006, 12:49 am
by timpronk
Some Quotes from Fieromx3:
"
yea my DE burns oil to. usually every 250kilometers itll burn a small bottle of oil or sometimes from my house to toronto (about 140 KILOMETERS) it will burn about 3/4 of a bottle..lol its really bad
"
This may slow it down the de just a little, as that most likely means low compression.
"
DE isnt really any slower than a ZE im comparing to a ZE well for some and im seeing alot DE's that are faster than me ppl underestimate the DE
1st- 15.374@89.59mph
2nd- 15.234@92.41
3rd-15.157@92.61mph
hmmm then my talon was s--- lol i was runin 15lbs a 3'' turbo back a k&n filter and a 1g hacked maf...and that only did 14.7
got a 15.6@91.5mph at best...not too bad
"
At least we have some de times in this thread. A 15.1 (not sure if that was your time fieromx3, or if you were talking about someone elses time) - 15.6 is not bad for a de burning oil.
I couldnt resist fieromx3, you just seamed a little negative lately about the mx, so I thought I would show you that at one point you felt a 15.6 was not too bad.
My best with a ze was 14.3 @ 98 at Sparta.
Posted: August 30th, 2006, 10:45 am
by XxantwawnxX
15.1 to a 14.3 is a pretty big jump in drag racin. I had got a 14.2 with just my ze, are you gutted by chance timpronk?