MX-3 vs. Integra

Guest · Post by **Guest** » February 13th, 2002, 11:33 pm

hey all this might help:my friend raced a 96 gs precidia in his 92 integra and lost.therefor the mx 3 is faster. it was a very close race but the mx-3 driver took more chances he said so i don't know. [img]shrug.gif"%20border="0[/img] also both were 5 speed with good drivers[ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: 92mx-3 ]

Guest · Post by **Guest** » February 13th, 2002, 11:35 pm

oh yeah and i raced the integra in my 92 rs sohc with 88 ponies and i got smoked big time, hehe..and the integra was stock and i had an exhaust system.. i literally got wiped out so u guys with a 4 banger, save your gas and reputation

A.S. · Post by **A.S.** » February 16th, 2002, 5:18 am

Sorry bro, ALL integras after 1990 are faster than MX-3 GS stock, and you can modify those SOO easily and for cheap! to compare check out <A HREF="http://www.car-stats.com/" TARGET=_blank>http://www.car-stats.com/</A>

Sean Mandell · Post by **Sean Mandell** » February 17th, 2002, 3:28 pm

but c'mon guys if you hardcore just save for the klze and stop talking stock cuz racing stock iz just stupid

Sean Mandell · Post by **Sean Mandell** » February 17th, 2002, 3:37 pm

And stop comparing with hondas they have nothing on mazdas and a lot of honda owners respect mazda engines and know better than to race a rotary. If u want to be spoon fed parts then u ain't original. b creative.

mitmaks · Post by **mitmaks** » February 18th, 2002, 7:16 pm

as far as power to weight ratio i think mx-3 is far better than acura

mitmaks · Post by **mitmaks** » February 18th, 2002, 7:21 pm

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by A.S.: Sorry bro, ALL integras after 1990 are faster than MX-3 GS stock, and you can modify those SOO easily and for cheap! to compare check out <A HREF="http://www.car-stats.com/" TARGET=_blank>http://www.car-stats.com/</A>< ... QUOTE>u know my mx-3 gs can do much faster than 9.6 0-60mph ...my damn civic can do 9.6 stock lol '88 4 door civic cmon u believe someone like that

Redline · Post by **Redline** » February 18th, 2002, 7:53 pm

Its not always about raw horsepower either. Power to weight is way more important.

A.S. · Post by **A.S.** » February 19th, 2002, 2:01 am

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by mitmaks: u know my mx-3 gs can do much faster than 9.6 0-60mph ...my damn civic can do 9.6 stock lol '88 4 door civic cmon u believe someone like that<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>What r u talkin about? these are official stats and they are the same everywhere you check. If youre racing, the best indicator of which car is faster is the 0-60 & 1/4 mile times and the GS is slower than the base Integra in both. Were not talking about other factors such as whose the better driver or track conditions or any other confounds. These times have been tested under the same conditions over and over again and the mean is taken for an average timing.

Sonicxtacy02 · Post by **Sonicxtacy02** » February 19th, 2002, 10:12 am

sorry but i would have to agree, a stock mx-3 does like high-mid 7's 0-60. At least mine did, and i have an auto.

mitmaks · Post by **mitmaks** » February 20th, 2002, 1:58 am

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Sonicxtacy02: sorry but i would have to agree, a stock mx-3 does like high-mid 7's 0-60. At least mine did, and i have an auto.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>yep, that's what i am talking about..its way more faster than that lol..maybe they're "official" but were tested by some computer guy that only can run keyboard and doesnt know that he supposed to accelerate.

Bri94GS · Post by **Bri94GS** » February 20th, 2002, 9:03 pm

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Redline: Ist Gen DSMs are soo damn fast, damn you

all you need is a damn boost controller and you can get soooooo close to 12s with very little else.

I got a zex kit that'll fit it too, but I wanna see how it drives without it first....

Mradio · Post by **Mradio** » February 20th, 2002, 10:41 pm

nice lookin engine bay. bri94gs, is that your car?

Buff1110 · Post by **Buff1110** » February 21st, 2002, 4:02 pm

I raced my friend in his 94or95 integra ls. he has intake, my 92gs has intake, exaust, short shifter. i beat him by a car. the mx will also pull on an integra but slowly. Dan

ProtegeSTS · Post by **ProtegeSTS** » February 21st, 2002, 7:15 pm

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by A.S.: What r u talkin about? these are official stats and they are the same everywhere you check. If youre racing, the best indicator of which car is faster is the 0-60 & 1/4 mile times and the GS is slower than the base Integra in both. Were not talking about other factors such as whose the better driver or track conditions or any other confounds. These times have been tested under the same conditions over and over again and the mean is taken for an average timing.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>No, youre wrong. Those times are usually on streets, and the cars arent launched hard. They are also test cars that are not taken care of, and just have reporter after reporter flog them. Magizine times are SLOWER than what you can really do, in MOST cases.

MX-3.com

MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra

Re: MX-3 vs. Integra