Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

V6 Technical/Performance Discussions
Post Reply
RedAutobotMX3
Regular Member
Posts: 77
Joined: May 23rd, 2010, 4:41 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~

Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by RedAutobotMX3 »

My CO% and HC PPM at idle has failed my states emissions test twice now(both hot and cold) and both times the 2 places have said its due to open vacuum lines most likely. The problem is, two of the lines run to the back of the motor which is near inaccessible but the largest issue is the line coming off the fuel pressure regulator and another line that is coming off the manifold at the bottom right runner. My research has shown these two lines to connect with the PRC solenoid valve which usually sits under the stock airbox. About the 5th pic down or the 4th diagram seen here
http://www.mx6.com/forums/2g-mx6-genera ... e-faq.html
I understand that one is a curved neck but all other diagrams point to the same thing; the line from the FPR should go into the "side" inlet closest to the oval mitsubishi branded plastic peice and the vacuum line(which always makes a whistling when disconnectedand sucks pretty hard) should plug in the bottom where the electrical connector plugs in.
Well if i do that, the damn thing just stalls. If i remove the PRC completely, it makes no difference at all and still runs fine. If i connect the two lines without the PRC it stalls as well. If i blow or suck on the PRC it flows, but im still thinking this part may be bad since it really hasnt been in use for probably the greater portion of 3 years. I'm really at a loss, as there are no junkyard cars near me to pull one off, and the car has a great steady idle and gets fine gas mileage but my nanny state wants me to spend no less than $150 on repairs before i can get a waiver.
Silkwyrm
Regular Member
Posts: 202
Joined: February 21st, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by Silkwyrm »

This tells you how to test the PRC
http://www.mx-3.com/manuals/showimg.php ... F2-119.gif

sounds like perhaps its stuck open?
User avatar
Daninski
Supporting Member
Posts: 7055
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 10:51 am
Location: Trenton ON.

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by Daninski »

I posted pics of all the vac lines and most pics show where they go to. Question is if you have another MX3, MX6 or Probe to look at you should be able to figure it out.
2004 Subaru WRX Silver, stage 2, minty interior.
2002 Subaru WRX Blue, SOLD (best E test numbers I've ever seen)
94 MX-6. Sold
92 GS KLZE 5 Speed
96 GS 5 speed, KLZE, Sold
95 GS Minty Shape Sold
92 GS Sold
92 GS Parts Car scrapped.
Feedback viewtopic.php?f=37&t=66348" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
7477th member.

I know you believe that you understand what you think I said but I'm sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
Daninski
Supporting Member
Posts: 7055
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 10:51 am
Location: Trenton ON.

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by Daninski »

I posted pics of all the vac lines and most pics show where they go to. Question is if you have another MX3, MX6 or Probe to look at you should be able to figure it out.

http://images.geekazoids.net/vacuumklze_copy1.gif
2004 Subaru WRX Silver, stage 2, minty interior.
2002 Subaru WRX Blue, SOLD (best E test numbers I've ever seen)
94 MX-6. Sold
92 GS KLZE 5 Speed
96 GS 5 speed, KLZE, Sold
95 GS Minty Shape Sold
92 GS Sold
92 GS Parts Car scrapped.
Feedback viewtopic.php?f=37&t=66348" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
7477th member.

I know you believe that you understand what you think I said but I'm sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
Daninski
Supporting Member
Posts: 7055
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 10:51 am
Location: Trenton ON.

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by Daninski »

I posted pics of all the vac lines and most pics show where they go to. Question is if you have another MX3, MX6 or Probe to look at you should be able to figure it out.

http://images.geekazoids.net/vacuumklze_copy1.gif
or
http://www.mx-3.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=63734
2004 Subaru WRX Silver, stage 2, minty interior.
2002 Subaru WRX Blue, SOLD (best E test numbers I've ever seen)
94 MX-6. Sold
92 GS KLZE 5 Speed
96 GS 5 speed, KLZE, Sold
95 GS Minty Shape Sold
92 GS Sold
92 GS Parts Car scrapped.
Feedback viewtopic.php?f=37&t=66348" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
7477th member.

I know you believe that you understand what you think I said but I'm sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

Dan posted pics of all the vac lines and most pics show where they go to. Question is if you have another MX3, MX6 or Probe to look at you should be able to figure it out.
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
kulluminati777
Senior Member
Posts: 2509
Joined: July 11th, 2010, 11:10 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Sunny California
Contact:

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by kulluminati777 »

Nd4SpdSe wrote:Dan posted pics of all the vac lines and most pics show where they go to. Question is if you have another MX3, MX6 or Probe to look at you should be able to figure it out.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
View my worklog: viewtopic.php?f=46&t=77688
Image
RedAutobotMX3
Regular Member
Posts: 77
Joined: May 23rd, 2010, 4:41 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by RedAutobotMX3 »

Well i got a new PRC solenoid valve and it still just stalls when installed and still runs fine with the electronics plugged into it but without the vacuum lines attached.
davmac
Regular Member
Posts: 551
Joined: January 15th, 2008, 6:45 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by davmac »

Are you running the engine with no vacuum applied to the fuel pressure regulator (fpr)? The PRC valve only interrupts vacuum for hot restarts. But if no vacuum is applied to the fpr then you'll have higher fuel pressure at the fuel rail during idle and probably running rich at idle when emissions are tested. Forget the PRC - it is relatively unimportant. But hook up vacuum from the back left intake manifold runner (where the prc valve should be hooked up) into the top of the fpr.
Image
Proud owner of a Faded Red 92 MX-3 GS
User avatar
Daninski
Supporting Member
Posts: 7055
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 10:51 am
Location: Trenton ON.

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by Daninski »

Man that was like deja vu X3 :lol:
2004 Subaru WRX Silver, stage 2, minty interior.
2002 Subaru WRX Blue, SOLD (best E test numbers I've ever seen)
94 MX-6. Sold
92 GS KLZE 5 Speed
96 GS 5 speed, KLZE, Sold
95 GS Minty Shape Sold
92 GS Sold
92 GS Parts Car scrapped.
Feedback viewtopic.php?f=37&t=66348" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
7477th member.

I know you believe that you understand what you think I said but I'm sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
RedAutobotMX3
Regular Member
Posts: 77
Joined: May 23rd, 2010, 4:41 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by RedAutobotMX3 »

davmac wrote:Are you running the engine with no vacuum applied to the fuel pressure regulator (fpr)? The PRC valve only interrupts vacuum for hot restarts. But if no vacuum is applied to the fpr then you'll have higher fuel pressure at the fuel rail during idle and probably running rich at idle when emissions are tested. Forget the PRC - it is relatively unimportant. But hook up vacuum from the back left intake manifold runner (where the prc valve should be hooked up) into the top of the fpr.
I'm gonna need clarification on that last part. None of the diagrams show anything about vacuum hoses from the back left runner going anywhere near the FPR. As stated in my original post and shown in the diagrams, the only vacuum ports/lines from the FPR connect to the PRC and then to the FRONT RIGHT intake runner where there is a ton of vacuum. coming off. If all you're saying is i need to find a suitable vacuum line to connect up to the fpr port then by all means ill give that a try.
davmac
Regular Member
Posts: 551
Joined: January 15th, 2008, 6:45 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by davmac »

Sorry if I'm confusing things. Left side of engine is closest to the bumper. Front of engine is timing belt and accessory belts.

The FPR needs vacuum to regulate appropriate fuel pressure. The prc valve sits between the vacuum source and the fpr. Usually the prc valve is doing nothing. Vacuum is flowing through it. The vacuum source is the intake manifold nipple at the rear of the engine left side (low on the intake runner near the distributor cap). I've got a KLG4 intake, but the KLDE was similar.

At idle vacuum is at its highest. With this vacuum applied to the fpr fuel flows through the fuel rail at a lower pressure so less fuel is pushed through the fuel injectors. Makes sense since you need less fuel at idle. With no vacuum at the fpr fuel pressure is higher than intended and more fuel is pushed through the injectors making you run rich.

The prc valve only works during hot restarts when it cuts vacuum and forces richer mix for the first minute of idle when the engine is already at operating temp.
Image
Proud owner of a Faded Red 92 MX-3 GS
RedAutobotMX3
Regular Member
Posts: 77
Joined: May 23rd, 2010, 4:41 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by RedAutobotMX3 »

davmac wrote:Sorry if I'm confusing things. Left side of engine is closest to the bumper. Front of engine is timing belt and accessory belts.

The FPR needs vacuum to regulate appropriate fuel pressure. The prc valve sits between the vacuum source and the fpr. Usually the prc valve is doing nothing. Vacuum is flowing through it. The vacuum source is the intake manifold nipple at the rear of the engine left side (low on the intake runner near the distributor cap). I've got a KLG4 intake, but the KLDE was similar.

At idle vacuum is at its highest. With this vacuum applied to the fpr fuel flows through the fuel rail at a lower pressure so less fuel is pushed through the fuel injectors. Makes sense since you need less fuel at idle. With no vacuum at the fpr fuel pressure is higher than intended and more fuel is pushed through the injectors making you run rich.

The prc valve only works during hot restarts when it cuts vacuum and forces richer mix for the first minute of idle when the engine is already at operating temp.
I understand what you are saying now, but when i connect the vacuum source coming off the manifold (as you stated and in the diagrams) to the FPR it just stalls/wont run. As soon as you even get the vacuum source close to the fpr it begins to sputter and die out but will immediately catch idle if you remove vacuum. I'd love nothing more than to need a Cosmo racing FPR, and it would certainly get me very close to the $150 i need to spend on it for a waiver, so any ways to diag a bad regulator?
davmac
Regular Member
Posts: 551
Joined: January 15th, 2008, 6:45 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Re: Failed Emissions Twice w/ DE swap; no CEL or any issues

Post by davmac »

FPR failure is usually ruptured diaphragm. If it was ruptured the vacuum hose would pull fuel into the intake and again your car would run rich. Any fuel in the vacuum hose when you remove it?

The fact that it immediately stalls makes me think something else is wrong. I'm just thinking during your testing if you saw fuel leaking from the vacuum line - or it was wet you would have noticed. I know it is a pain, but double check all your vacuum lines.

Sticking with the fuel possibilities it could also be clogged fuel filter or weak fuel pump. Maybe with vacuum on the fpr there isn't enough fuel flow to maintain idle. If possible try a used fpr to see if it makes a difference.
Image
Proud owner of a Faded Red 92 MX-3 GS
Post Reply

Return to “V6 Technical/Performance”