intake

jkbreazeale · Post by **jkbreazeale** » February 17th, 2010, 1:12 am

I know i'm tired... but did I miss something in that last post Flyer?

Ryan · Post by **Ryan** » February 17th, 2010, 11:54 am

Did you READ it? I love it.

jkbreazeale · Post by **jkbreazeale** » February 17th, 2010, 3:19 pm

Haha! I couldn't read it for being so tired last night...

MapaX5 · Post by **MapaX5** » February 19th, 2010, 7:11 pm

use an integra intake.

jkbreazeale · Post by **jkbreazeale** » February 19th, 2010, 7:34 pm

I've heard civic, crx, and integra... I found one for an 88-91 CRX Si for $34 shipped, it didn't look like the rest of the intakes for the CRX, it had the extra nipple where the larger hose from the IAC (possibly) goes into the intake. Hopefully, it is the same product as the photo or ima gonna be pissed! Thanks for the help though MapaX5.

MapaX5 · Post by **MapaX5** » February 19th, 2010, 8:38 pm

jkbreazeale wrote:I've heard civic, crx, and integra... I found one for an 88-91 CRX Si for $34 shipped, it didn't look like the rest of the intakes for the CRX, it had the extra nipple where the larger hose from the IAC (possibly) goes into the intake. Hopefully, it is the same product as the photo or ima gonna be pissed! Thanks for the help though MapaX5.

no pro. that's what we're here for! lol.
although i'm using a '95 integra intake on mine, and other than the mounting braket being useless (the intake would be mounted upside down in relation to our left side/right side intakes) it fit nice and even cleared the disty and matched the TB.

jkbreazeale · Post by **jkbreazeale** » February 28th, 2010, 3:36 pm

Alas.... the bastard sent me the wrong one. FAIL

MapaX5 · Post by **MapaX5** » March 10th, 2010, 8:02 pm

jkbreazeale wrote:Alas.... the bastard sent me the wrong one. FAIL

sorry, had to do it.

jkbreazeale · Post by **jkbreazeale** » March 10th, 2010, 9:48 pm

I am glad you found humor in my misfortune.

MapaX5 · Post by **MapaX5** » March 11th, 2010, 1:57 am

hey, it's always good to laugh at someone else's expense!
i bet if we were walking down an icey road and i fell, you'd laugh, THEN ask if i was ok!
lol, i know i WOULD.
on the serious note, what a douche! what are you gonna do about it?
i personally got a '95 integra intake and it works fine.

jkbreazeale · Post by **jkbreazeale** » March 11th, 2010, 5:53 am

Well, the one he pictured, would have worked perfectly... however that is not the one he sent. Started a dispute against him on paypal to either swap me out with the one that was pictured or to be issued a full refund. His ad stated that I would received everything that was pictured. On the same note, I went to go outside and make sure that it wouldn't fit, and it is definitely not going to work.

MapaX5 · Post by **MapaX5** » March 11th, 2010, 7:01 pm

ok, good luck.

SpatialTerror · Post by **SpatialTerror** » March 12th, 2010, 4:00 am

well i didnt read the last 5 replys.
but the flat fact is cold air is a lie!!!
bmw did extencive studys on cold air intakes.
it makes the fuel atomize slower. effectively decreasing hp.
but a short ram air is a good way to go.
nice hot air and less distance it has to travel to get into the motor.

SpatialTerror · Post by **SpatialTerror** » March 12th, 2010, 4:01 am

oh and a 92 will not fit on a 92.
thats crazy talk man!!!

MX-3.com

intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake

Re: intake