Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

This forum is for Discussion on Suspension issues.
User avatar
onlytrueromeo
Senior Member
Posts: 2756
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 10:05 pm
Location: Albany, NY

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by onlytrueromeo »

Well, if you were rally racing you'd need a roll-cage...you'd be silly to go without one!

Undercarriage brace shouldn't weight too much, maybe 50lbs tops as far as I see it. Welding the seams would help, but that's for the body, not the main frame. If the frame had small spot welds it'd fall apart. It'd be a huge improvement over stock though, and if rallying a car, def. something that should be looked into!
Collier
Regular Member
Posts: 32
Joined: December 6th, 2008, 10:32 pm
Location: Dallas TX - republican land

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by Collier »

I have a chassis stiffening fetish and I've been obsessing over this for a while for my miata and the mx3.

I found this link to be pretty helpful
http://members.fortunecity.com/jasoncuadra/id51.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
nightfire
Regular Member
Posts: 756
Joined: March 1st, 2007, 11:17 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by nightfire »

That's somewhat similar to what I was thinking, except I'll be welding the main frame rail reinforcements. I hadn't thought of extending them to the suspension/subframe, but I might just do that now...
- Gord
1996 MX-3 GS-ZE 2.5L 5spd
KLZE+LSD / Headers / KL02 VAF / Clutchmasters stage-I / Fidanza 9lb flywheel / Eibach Pro Kit / Tokico HPs / Urethane bushings & mounts / SSR Comp-C 16x7 / General Exclaim UHP 205/45R16 / Wilwood 13" brakes / Whiteline rear swaybar / Carputer / Software Crossover / Infinity components+subs / 41hz Tripath Amp9 / Trunk SLA batt / Keyless entry
User avatar
fowljesse
Supporting Member
Posts: 5676
Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
Location: portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by fowljesse »

That's exactly how I was thinking to build it. I want to bolt it on, because at some point, it's going to get dinged by a rock, speed bump, etc...
Thanks for the link!
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11213
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

Hmm, maybe make some out of aluminum? ;)
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
fowljesse
Supporting Member
Posts: 5676
Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
Location: portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by fowljesse »

Bingo!
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
nightfire
Regular Member
Posts: 756
Joined: March 1st, 2007, 11:17 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by nightfire »

Aluminum = expensive.. :(

But, if you can afford it, why not? I priced out my components in hot rolled steel at < $100 shipped. The same in aluminum or stainless steel were well over $500.

Also, aluminum has about half the strength by volume, meaning you might have issues with either continued flex, or ground clearance.
- Gord
1996 MX-3 GS-ZE 2.5L 5spd
KLZE+LSD / Headers / KL02 VAF / Clutchmasters stage-I / Fidanza 9lb flywheel / Eibach Pro Kit / Tokico HPs / Urethane bushings & mounts / SSR Comp-C 16x7 / General Exclaim UHP 205/45R16 / Wilwood 13" brakes / Whiteline rear swaybar / Carputer / Software Crossover / Infinity components+subs / 41hz Tripath Amp9 / Trunk SLA batt / Keyless entry
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by wytbishop »

there has to be some flex. When loads are applied if the chassis cannot deform it will break. Too much flex is bad, but too little is really bad.

Ultra stiff racing type stuff is manufactured to not have to flex. Standard unibody manufacturing has thousands of spot welds that will break if the car doesn't give a little.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
nightfire
Regular Member
Posts: 756
Joined: March 1st, 2007, 11:17 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by nightfire »

wytbishop wrote:there has to be some flex. When loads are applied if the chassis cannot deform it will break. Too much flex is bad, but too little is really bad.

Ultra stiff racing type stuff is manufactured to not have to flex. Standard unibody manufacturing has thousands of spot welds that will break if the car doesn't give a little.
Where do you think the major stress points would be? Assuming the reinforcement is very rigid and won't fracture/deform, what's the next likely trouble spot?
- Gord
1996 MX-3 GS-ZE 2.5L 5spd
KLZE+LSD / Headers / KL02 VAF / Clutchmasters stage-I / Fidanza 9lb flywheel / Eibach Pro Kit / Tokico HPs / Urethane bushings & mounts / SSR Comp-C 16x7 / General Exclaim UHP 205/45R16 / Wilwood 13" brakes / Whiteline rear swaybar / Carputer / Software Crossover / Infinity components+subs / 41hz Tripath Amp9 / Trunk SLA batt / Keyless entry
Collier
Regular Member
Posts: 32
Joined: December 6th, 2008, 10:32 pm
Location: Dallas TX - republican land

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by Collier »

http://www.miata.net/hakuna/0007/h0001.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think that this is an answer to cost/material question. Aluminum tubing filled with sand, the sand helps to reduce the amount of twist in the tubes but also gives it some movement. What most of you are talking about is a big underbrace like Flyin'Miata's butterfly, but a bunch of these put together could do the same thing for less money.

It wont do anything for the framerails themselves though.

Also the weak points would be:
Where the bolts go through the metal, because all of the force that we are trying to transfer from side to side will eventually come to a couple of bolts in thin sheet metal.
or
Where the welds tie the brace to the frame, welds can be broken pretty easily when you're dealing with high stress points that are used each time that you drive the car
User avatar
fowljesse
Supporting Member
Posts: 5676
Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
Location: portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by fowljesse »

We have a good scrapyard here. They have alot of Aluminum tubing that seems to be unused odds, and ends, and is priced good. I wouldn't use "used" peices because I don't know what kind of metal fatigue I'd inherit. I'd look for easton, or Alcoa.
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by wytbishop »

To make any real advancements with a product like this you would have to model the chassis and perform a finite element analysis. It's just too complex a question to make any assumptions at all. Things like strut bars and tie bars and cross members are just an application of general principles without any real engineering. Tying the frame rails together though is a whole different deal. You could really seriously mess up the cars handling if you put it in the wrong place. Before you start strengthening stuff you have to have at least an idea where the weakness is. If you put a reinforcing device in the wrong spot the weakest point becomes even weaker relatively speaking. So now the part of the frame that was flexing a bit before is flexing a lot because the other part of the frame that was working with it is tight as a drum all of a sudden.

Without some serious engineering I will go on record as suggesting that this is a bad idea.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User avatar
fowljesse
Supporting Member
Posts: 5676
Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
Location: portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by fowljesse »

That's why I recommended seam welding right away. You can improve on the engineering in place, and add almost no weight. Of course it would ruin the crumple ability, and possibly injure you much more in a wreck.
I would do it if I could, though.
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
User avatar
onlytrueromeo
Senior Member
Posts: 2756
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 10:05 pm
Location: Albany, NY

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by onlytrueromeo »

^I would rather have my car be slightly solid than a complete crumpled mess. People that would be doing this should have 5point harnesses if theyre taking the time to reweld the body to the frame of the car!
nightfire
Regular Member
Posts: 756
Joined: March 1st, 2007, 11:17 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Chassis stiffening/reinforcement project

Post by nightfire »

wytbishop wrote:To make any real advancements with a product like this you would have to model the chassis and perform a finite element analysis. It's just too complex a question to make any assumptions at all. Things like strut bars and tie bars and cross members are just an application of general principles without any real engineering. Tying the frame rails together though is a whole different deal. You could really seriously mess up the cars handling if you put it in the wrong place. Before you start strengthening stuff you have to have at least an idea where the weakness is. If you put a reinforcing device in the wrong spot the weakest point becomes even weaker relatively speaking. So now the part of the frame that was flexing a bit before is flexing a lot because the other part of the frame that was working with it is tight as a drum all of a sudden.

Without some serious engineering I will go on record as suggesting that this is a bad idea.
Bah. We're all just hobbyists tinkering with our $2500 cars... not an F1 race team or aircraft designer. 8)

We're doing this to have fun, right? So if it's a total flop or makes things worse, that's life. Get it right next car!

If on the off-chance it turns it into a more enjoyable car, however .. what a rush. That's what I live for. That moment I lit up my KLZE for the first time. That moment I tried my new suspension setup. The moment it all hit me that it was coming together..

That makes it worthwhile.
- Gord
1996 MX-3 GS-ZE 2.5L 5spd
KLZE+LSD / Headers / KL02 VAF / Clutchmasters stage-I / Fidanza 9lb flywheel / Eibach Pro Kit / Tokico HPs / Urethane bushings & mounts / SSR Comp-C 16x7 / General Exclaim UHP 205/45R16 / Wilwood 13" brakes / Whiteline rear swaybar / Carputer / Software Crossover / Infinity components+subs / 41hz Tripath Amp9 / Trunk SLA batt / Keyless entry
Post Reply

Return to “Suspension/Brakes/Wheels/Tires”