![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Tiff Needel Front wheel Drive Techniques; Ford Puma
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBPH94cYKO0
Tiff Needell Rear wheel Drive Techniques; BMW Z3 M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7JQvCEO ... ed&search=
Red Egg wrote:Jacbs2007 wrote: 100lbs=100lbs! I'm a genious!Urban Dictionary definition of "Genious"
It is often the case that [people] describe themselves as 'genious' but are ironically ignorant to the fact that the word is spelt 'genius' - much to the amusement of intelligent people.
"Like, woah, yeah man, I'm like, such a genious, dude!"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=genious
Red Egg wrote:Urban Dictionary definition of "Genious"
It is often the case that [people] describe themselves as 'genious' but are ironically ignorant to the fact that the word is spelt 'genius' - much to the amusement of intelligent people.
"Like, woah, yeah man, I'm like, such a genious, dude!"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=genious
So your original comments were a sarcastic insult? Nice one!Jacbs2007 wrote:I was being extremely sarcastic? If you would have seen that then perhaps you would realize I in no way implied I WAS a "genious"
HAHAHA.. now I get why you state things without backing them up. It's because you can't read.Red Egg wrote:When I read this comparison of two Dodge Daytonas; one FWD and one RWD, it really drives home the argument that FWDs are better:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/cvetters3/test2.htm
So if they are indeed the same, why waste your money on something that costs more, and is inferior in slippery conditions? (other than numbskullery?)mr1in6billion wrote: infact the article tries to make it clear that in the end neither one is superior to the other.
"On a wet or greasy track, better traction off the corners puts the front-driver in a class of its own."
Better traction may not necessarily mean that it's faster around the corners though. I'm finding it difficult to believe that a FWD is slower going around a corner than a RWD, whether it's on a wet track or not. Perhaps they meant that it's safer using a FWD around corners? I still believe that with a professionaly driver, RWD would be faster around corners, as long as the driver was in proper control of the car. Not going to explain why, because I would just be repeating arguments that have already been stated.Red Egg wrote:"On a wet or greasy track, better traction off the corners puts the front-driver in a class of its own."
The above quotes says it all. FWD is in a "class of its own". RDWers have been owned!