Building regular 4 cyl instead of BPT....

4-Cyl. Technical/Performance Discussions
User avatar
MechaManZero
Regular Member
Posts: 690
Joined: March 20th, 2006, 7:36 pm

Post by MechaManZero »

KJ wrote:So now i am kind of confused i want to be street legal but i want to pull as much w/hp out of her as i can
Ummm. I don't think anything aftermarket for speed is so called street legal. LOL. Yeah. If there was a limit for the streets I think I heard that anything above 500HP is not street legal. I don't know or remember if this was true or not.

JUST TURBO IT lol. You can do it.
Çlark
Image
95 Mazda MX3 4 Banger
Currently: H&R Lowering springs, BPT from a GTR, 18.5x6x3.5 same side inlet and outlet intercooler, Centerforce Dual Friction clutch
For BPT Frorums - http://www.aokforums.com/mazdaengines/
Cy
Regular Member
Posts: 631
Joined: February 27th, 2005, 8:58 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Post by Cy »

WingleBeast wrote:thank god. my goal right now is 250 wHP, but im sure it will change to 350, then 450.. and so on untill i either die or blow the car up
I hear that..

I prefer autox and generally driving quickly round town.. I'm going for F1 not TopFuel. Airgo i don't want to go round a corner, stop it and fly off on a tangent...My plan is to build a Super quick motor with 250whp but also a higher final gear ratio..

Current = 4.11 in 5th 0.79 - on 185/65-14's @ 7000rpm = 242.2KPH
Manual GS Ring Gear = 4.39 in 5th 0.79 - on 185/65-14's @ 7000rpm = 226.7KPH

0-60 will loose about .2 seconds :D.. and then 215/45-16 inch lightweights..

Possibly getting the trans regeared for close ratios ending with what is now 4th gear as 5th..
WingleBeast
Regular Member
Posts: 325
Joined: February 28th, 2006, 5:46 pm

Post by WingleBeast »

ahh the drawbacks of 5 speeds...

either acceloration or top speed... cant have em both
Cy
Regular Member
Posts: 631
Joined: February 27th, 2005, 8:58 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Post by Cy »

WingleBeast wrote:ahh the drawbacks of 5 speeds...

either acceloration or top speed... cant have em both
could tunnel it and put a 6spd Miata chassis under it... but i'm not going to
WingleBeast
Regular Member
Posts: 325
Joined: February 28th, 2006, 5:46 pm

Post by WingleBeast »

be so hard for not much gain, but dont get me wrong, it would be badass
Cy
Regular Member
Posts: 631
Joined: February 27th, 2005, 8:58 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Post by Cy »

WingleBeast wrote:be so hard for not much gain, but dont get me wrong, it would be badass
not much gain... are u madd... RWD is a MASSIVE gain + the extra weight of the rear end would balance the car.. if not heavy up the rear...
WingleBeast
Regular Member
Posts: 325
Joined: February 28th, 2006, 5:46 pm

Post by WingleBeast »

its just not cost effective. miatas still onyl get so much WHP with the 2.0.

just better off keeping it FWD and turboing
Post Reply

Return to “4-Cyl. Technical/Performance”