Does anyone have any experience with this electric supercharger? There is hardly ANY information about them in these forums. It has been suggested that it may be the first true electric supercharger that can actually produce results. I have read the listing for it and it states that it flows up to 6psi at 455 CFM, weighs approximately 17lbs, and acts much like a rechargeable 15 second shot of NOS. It almost sounds too good; recharges, no mpg loss unless in use, lightweight, etc.
Also, can anyone comment on how much of a power increase a 95' 1.6 DOHC engine would see, mostly stock, from 6psi of boost? BTW, I haved searched for thomas knight, electric superchargers, and superchargers. Thanks for everyone's input.
Chris
Thomas Knight ESC Electric Supercharger
Thomas Knight ESC Electric Supercharger
95' MX-3 RS, front and rear stabilizer bars, B&M short shifter, homemade ground kit, all power options just installed, passport 8500 X50 radar detector (+15HP, -8mpg, +20mi/hr top end on the highway)
Knight
Yes, there are a lot of results for a Thomas Knight search. All of these results deal either with Knight's turbo's, Eaton superchargers, or something else. None of them really directly address the new ESC Electric Supercharger and whether or not it's good or bad, works or not.BuGS
PostPosted: 25 April 2006, 22:51 Post subject:
What are you talking about? Did you search here? There are 2 pages of results for Thomas Knight alone.
95' MX-3 RS, front and rear stabilizer bars, B&M short shifter, homemade ground kit, all power options just installed, passport 8500 X50 radar detector (+15HP, -8mpg, +20mi/hr top end on the highway)
It dont work...
I read they weigh about 17lbs, and whatever minor gain you _might_ get, is negated by the added weight.
You`d probably be better of removing the rear seats and some unnecessary weight from the car.
If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
Oh, and havent Tomas Knight turbos a bad enough rep on their true turbo/sc kits? why would an electric sc be any better....?
spend the money on something that matters, like suspension and brakes.
-nope
I read they weigh about 17lbs, and whatever minor gain you _might_ get, is negated by the added weight.
You`d probably be better of removing the rear seats and some unnecessary weight from the car.
If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
Oh, and havent Tomas Knight turbos a bad enough rep on their true turbo/sc kits? why would an electric sc be any better....?
spend the money on something that matters, like suspension and brakes.
-nope
:: 2001 Mazda Mx-5 Sport // 2013 Volvo V40 D2 Momentum ::
Ahhh, nice. I did see that thread in my searches, but since it had Eaton in the subject and I had already read a lot about eaton superchargers, I decided not to read that post. Obviously, it had much more to do with the electric supercharger than the thread title revealed.
95' MX-3 RS, front and rear stabilizer bars, B&M short shifter, homemade ground kit, all power options just installed, passport 8500 X50 radar detector (+15HP, -8mpg, +20mi/hr top end on the highway)
BTW Nope, you may want to check out the thread posted by custom. VERY informative and teasing. Thomas Knight himself posted to clear things up. I May end up going with one this summer.
95' MX-3 RS, front and rear stabilizer bars, B&M short shifter, homemade ground kit, all power options just installed, passport 8500 X50 radar detector (+15HP, -8mpg, +20mi/hr top end on the highway)
Yeah, I read it, but imho it`s a stupid idea, first you need a 200amp (or more) alternator plus lots of weight in batteries etc.
Why not just pay $400 more and get a turbokit with the power all the time, and not just in 15sec periods and then have to wait for it to recharge and stuff.
I just dont see this as a useful product.
-nope
Why not just pay $400 more and get a turbokit with the power all the time, and not just in 15sec periods and then have to wait for it to recharge and stuff.
I just dont see this as a useful product.
-nope
:: 2001 Mazda Mx-5 Sport // 2013 Volvo V40 D2 Momentum ::
Nitrous will be a continual cost of refilling tanks. A turbo, which is always on, will constantly drink more fuel. The ESC won't tax your engine until you use it, plus it can provide multiple bursts one after another according to Knight. Personally, I can't afford 20 or so mpg around town.
95' MX-3 RS, front and rear stabilizer bars, B&M short shifter, homemade ground kit, all power options just installed, passport 8500 X50 radar detector (+15HP, -8mpg, +20mi/hr top end on the highway)
A turboed engine will only use more fuel when under boost.mx3dude wrote:Nitrous will be a continual cost of refilling tanks. A turbo, which is always on, will constantly drink more fuel. The ESC won't tax your engine until you use it, plus it can provide multiple bursts one after another according to Knight. Personally, I can't afford 20 or so mpg around town.
With normal cruising you might actually use less fuel, as the car runs easier due to more power.
Anyway, be glad you dont live here... we pay about $8 pr.gallon as of now.
-nope
:: 2001 Mazda Mx-5 Sport // 2013 Volvo V40 D2 Momentum ::
$8/gal?!