Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

This forum is for Discussion on Suspension issues.
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by MrMazda92 »

Alright you guys... I do remember seeing a topic on this before, but search yielded nothing helpful. :/

I'm getting to the point where a total teardown and rebuild is appealing for my '92. I want to yank the engine and trans. completely, axles and all, without sacrificing the ability to roll it around the driveway. Have any of you done this in the past, and by any chance documented the process?

Time is not an issue, as I have another car to drive to/from work and class for the duration of the project. I just need to be able to roll the shell around the driveway(musical cars, you know), and possibly onto a flatbed trailer when the weather gets colder.

Basically, I want to know what exactly it will take to safely roll the car around the yard. Yank the axles and engine/trans, but replace the spindles/hubs afterwards, and go from there? Will that cause the wheel bearings to wear prematurely?

Thanks.
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T + STP - 3.92 w/ LSD, JG Cam, headers, SkipShift delete, Clutch Delay Valve delete, Hurst STS, RAM Clutch Adjuster, StopTech 6 Piston Brakes, Sticky Nittos, 435 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF SC Cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MegaSquirt/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by wytbishop »

In my opinion it's fine. Some people say that it damages the wheel bearings but that never made sense to me. The forces on the inner race are the same whether the axel stub is in the hub or not.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Redline322
Regular Member
Posts: 174
Joined: November 22nd, 2008, 2:20 pm
Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by Redline322 »

As long as you dont damage a brake line or leave the e brake intact, you should be fine to move it around without a drivetrain safely. Just think of it as a large go cart, you just dont want it to roll too much and end up on the road or into the back of the garage, had a few close calls with mine. If you are planning a full teardown and rebuild, I'd imagine you'd be changing the wheel bearing anyway unless you changed them recently, but I wouldnt be concerned about premature wear anyway for the short amount of rolling around to move it.
93 323 Bp'd, Front and rear strut braces, Mx-3 seats, JDM headlights and grill SOLD
93 Mx-3 GS Curved-Neck KLZE, 5 speed Conversion, Fidanza Flywheel, Cross Drilled Rotors
davmac
Regular Member
Posts: 551
Joined: January 15th, 2008, 6:45 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by davmac »

^ I'm with them.
It's a little inconvenient since you'll have to reassemble the steering knuckle to the strut, ball joint, outer tie rod - depending on what you disassembled to remove the axles, transmission and motor. But the car should then roll around fine and will be lighter too. Good luck with your project. The problem is deciding when enough is enough. You didn't ask, but my advice: Don't go overboard. Have fun but do whatever it takes to get it back together and on the road. Too many project cars are never driven.
Image
Proud owner of a Faded Red 92 MX-3 GS
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by MrMazda92 »

Thank you guys, exactly what I was hoping to hear! :lol:

I'm replacing the front spindles, hubs/bearings included. The rears are up for consideration at this point, I may just swap to 5 lug hubs w/ extended studs and spacers for the FD wheels.

Engine swap, suspension upgrades(SRD goodies, poly bushings), brake swap(fronts for sure), stainless wherever rust exists, and a basic wiretuck.

The car should be back on the road by late February at the latest. I wouldn't enjoy it even a tiny bit sitting unused in the driveway, I promise! :lol:
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T + STP - 3.92 w/ LSD, JG Cam, headers, SkipShift delete, Clutch Delay Valve delete, Hurst STS, RAM Clutch Adjuster, StopTech 6 Piston Brakes, Sticky Nittos, 435 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF SC Cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MegaSquirt/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
ganue
Supporting Member
Posts: 314
Joined: January 27th, 2008, 11:01 pm
Location: Waterford, MI

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by ganue »

According to my son's experience, a bearing with no halfshaft and nut should last about 2,000 miles on a car carrier and about 0.75 miles being pushed:

http://www.rs25.com/forums/f145/t164980 ... ost2597026

Good luck!!!
1993 GS SE - "slow" (Stock) - SOLD
1993 GS SE - "fast" (Curved neck KLZE, OBX headers, custom 2.5" exhaust, KL36 ECU, Exedy Probe GT clutch, KL36 LSD - the real one, Lantis Type R lefthand halfshaft - unfortunately worth mentioning)- SOLD

1993 GS SE - acquired 4/28/2013, SOLD February 28, 2015

1985 RX-7 GSL-SE - SOLD
2003 VW GTI 1.8T
2009 Mazda5 Grand Touring
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by MrMazda92 »

Definitely confident in this at this point haha, thank you guys.
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T + STP - 3.92 w/ LSD, JG Cam, headers, SkipShift delete, Clutch Delay Valve delete, Hurst STS, RAM Clutch Adjuster, StopTech 6 Piston Brakes, Sticky Nittos, 435 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF SC Cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MegaSquirt/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
User avatar
Ryan
Senior Member
Posts: 7198
Joined: April 7th, 2008, 1:06 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Manitoba

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by Ryan »

Our front wheel bearings aren't tapers?

If they are tapers, the axle nut pre tensions the bearing and holds it together, running without a stub in there will cause the hub to just fall out of the spindle.

If they're straight roller/ball... then no stub required.
Now with Moderator power!

Black '93 BP RS - wrecked, parted, scrapped.
Green GS - Sold.
Black GS - Summer DD/Race car - Fancy KLZE
Red GS - K8-ATX -> MTX-KLDE - Frakencar. Scrapped
White GS - Rusty. Parts. Scrapped
1997 BMW M3 - my summer baby
2002 BMW 325Xi - sold
2003 Forester Xti - EJ20K swapped.
Feedback
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by wytbishop »

They are not tapered. However the argument is that without the stub the hub is not properly supported in the spindle and the bearing receives too much lateral loading.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
crazycanadian
Regular Member
Posts: 605
Joined: September 3rd, 2006, 10:29 pm
Location: Langley, BC

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by crazycanadian »

wytbishop wrote:They are not tapered. However the argument is that without the stub the hub is not properly supported in the spindle and the bearing receives too much lateral loading.
This is the problem.... You don't have to install the axle stud.. But what you do is get a couple big 9/16 or 1/2 bolts with a few big washers(have 2 or 3 on either side of each bearing)... You install the bolt and washers to keep the some tension on the bearings...
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by wytbishop »

This is what the hub assembly looks like...

Image

The Hub is blue, the bearing is grey, the axel stub is orange and the steering knuckle is black. Notice that the hub and inner bearing race don't touch anything but the axel stub. Even if the stub, or a big bolt were in there, I don't see how it offers any additional support to the bearing. That axel stub is a CV joint. It is physically incapable of generating stress in any direction. Its job is to allow movement in all directions. All that stub shaft is doing is holding the hub in the inner race. A bolt with washers would not do anything.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
crazycanadian
Regular Member
Posts: 605
Joined: September 3rd, 2006, 10:29 pm
Location: Langley, BC

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by crazycanadian »

wytbishop wrote: The Hub is blue, the bearing is grey, the axel stub is orange and the steering knuckle is black. Notice that the hub and inner bearing race don't touch anything but the axel stub. Even if the stub, or a big bolt were in there, I don't see how it offers any additional support to the bearing. That axel stub is a CV joint. It is physically incapable of generating stress in any direction. Its job is to allow movement in all directions. All that stub shaft is doing is holding the hub in the inner race. A bolt with washers would not do anything.
The inner race isn't 1 piece... Its 2 piece... The axle shaft/nut applies preload on the bearing and keeps the inner races in their proper spots....

You know what I was going to write more out, but I have a spare set of hubs/knuckles that I can sacrifice and take pictures of to show what happens...
wytbishop
Senior Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: August 25th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by wytbishop »

No you know what that totally makes sense. I've heard this many times over the years and lots of guys have said they had this happen but it never made sense. If the inner race is two pieces that would totally explain it.
94' RS/GS/MS/CF Monster Turbo...coming soon.
93' GS SE, the Black Beast, the former love of my life...soon to be gutted and crushed.
94' GS, black on black, now in several small pieces...and one large crushed piece.
2007 Mazda3 GT Sport --- super fun
2004 Honda RC51 --- Lost forever to some theavin' bastard
My Worklog
My feedback thread
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by MrMazda92 »

So... don't do this?
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T + STP - 3.92 w/ LSD, JG Cam, headers, SkipShift delete, Clutch Delay Valve delete, Hurst STS, RAM Clutch Adjuster, StopTech 6 Piston Brakes, Sticky Nittos, 435 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF SC Cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MegaSquirt/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
crazycanadian
Regular Member
Posts: 605
Joined: September 3rd, 2006, 10:29 pm
Location: Langley, BC

Re: Rolling Chassis, no engine/trans

Post by crazycanadian »

MrMazda92 wrote:So... don't do this?
crazycanadian wrote:You don't have to install the axle stud.. But what you do is get a couple big 9/16 or 1/2 bolts with a few big washers(have 2 or 3 on either side of each bearing)... You install the bolt and washers to keep the some tension on the bearings...
follow and you will be fine..
Post Reply

Return to “Suspension/Brakes/Wheels/Tires”