Advice needed: Dinan ECU for K8: Yea or nay?

A section dedicated to Engine Mangement Systems & Engine Tuning. Megasquirt, SMS, Haltek, ect.
Post Reply
PurpleDinosaur
Regular Member
Posts: 148
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 1:09 pm
Location: Detroit 'burbs

Advice needed: Dinan ECU for K8: Yea or nay?

Post by PurpleDinosaur »

Background: 93 GS SE Stock K8. Will be adding CAI and Cat Back 2.5" exhaust (probably pacesetter causeI'm lazy) Don't have the know how to do a ZE or DE Swap nor tha money to have it done...

Read the corksport Project MX-3 page and they mention:

DINAN ECU -- This is a very similar product to what SUPERCHIPS offers. HP gains in the 10-15 range which are acheived by tuning the engine to run off high-octane gas. There is a definite 'seat of the pants' improvement to the power and throttle response on an otherwise unmodified Mx3. We recommend this improvement as the best 'bang for the buck' modification for power increase on the Mx3. The advantages of the DINAN and SUPERCHIP ECU's will be negated to a certain degree if the engine is heavily modified.

Is this fact or fiction?

Anyone have use one? Have one?


I already burn 92+ octane fuel... used to race 4 stroke dirt bikes and know that higher octance = cooler motor... so given how senstive ours are to heat I run high(er) octane gas... Reading that a modded ECU would create more power with the fuel I burn anyway, it seemed a natural.

I searched and have a number of thread about modded ECUs but most they talk about ZE issues...

Any help would be great. I'm motor literate but by no means a "tuner"... so treat me like a newb.

THanks in advance for your help!


-Barney
Last edited by PurpleDinosaur on July 27th, 2007, 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
93 GS SE
User avatar
PATDIESEL
Senior Member
Posts: 4476
Joined: August 13th, 2001, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Atlanta, GA.

Post by PATDIESEL »

Not worth the money IMO. Spend the dough on some suspension goodies if you want to go faster without the trouble of wiring in some part or worrying about how to install it.
Image
ZE -strait neck,headers,2.5 exhaust,pheno spacers,lower cross member,GC coils,MS struts,Brembo slotted rotors,filled MS mounts,SS brake/clutch lines, CAI,to rear bat reloc,Hella headlamps,Hella DE fogs 180WHP
PurpleDinosaur
Regular Member
Posts: 148
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 1:09 pm
Location: Detroit 'burbs

Post by PurpleDinosaur »

PATDIESEL wrote:Not worth the money IMO. Spend the dough on some suspension goodies if you want to go faster without the trouble of wiring in some part or worrying about how to install it.
hmmm - not sure I get how suspension parts will make me faster (unless they will help me launch without wheel hop?) but no matter...

I was skeptical of the +10 hp claim... The only way I can see this working would be if the system advances the spark and High Occtane fuel keeps it from detonating... but 10hp???

As for wiring - I was under the impression that the ECU was reprogramed and had planned on buying a new one to be modded... I guess thats not how it works?

My car's pretty fun as is... but I'd sure like to coax a bit more power out of it...

-Barney
93 GS SE
User avatar
Tunes67
Supporting Member
Posts: 4708
Joined: January 27th, 2005, 6:36 pm
Location: Everett, WA
Contact:

Post by Tunes67 »

Just as a side note.. I think you will lose power with 2.5" exaust on the K8. I think you will lose exaust velocity due to the large size of the pipe.. which in turn will reduce the scavenging effect and result in more unburnt gasses left in your cylinders after each exaust stroke. Resulting in less power and lower fuel economy.

Long story short.. for the K8.. I wouldnt go larger than 2.25". But thats just my opinion :)

Tunes67
"So long.. and thanks for all the fish!" "Momma says VW Bugs are the devil" "This one time at band camp.. I stuck a flute in my Throttle Body" ;)
"Screw you guys.. I am goin home"

I am the Cranky God of Mods!!! Tremble before my fury!! LOL
PurpleDinosaur
Regular Member
Posts: 148
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 1:09 pm
Location: Detroit 'burbs

Post by PurpleDinosaur »

Thanks for the tip Tunes; I was waffling between 2.25 and 2.5 and in typically male fashion opted for the Tim the Tool Man "Bigger is better" mentality... thanks for bringing me back to reality! LOL

Is 2.5" good for DE or ZE swaps? Asking cause if I can't extract another 10-15 whp from the K8 (NA) I should just leave it alone until I'm ready to drop a 2.5 in it...


ps - I read the thread on exhaust diamter / back pressure; just din't realize the 2.5 was past the point of diminishing returns for the K8.
93 GS SE
User avatar
Tunes67
Supporting Member
Posts: 4708
Joined: January 27th, 2005, 6:36 pm
Location: Everett, WA
Contact:

Post by Tunes67 »

You know.. I havent seen numbers that would say 2.25 or 2.5 is the best for the DE or ZE. But both engines move a LOT more air than the K8. On a naturally aspirated DE or ZE.. "At a guess" You'd probably get better low end torque with the 2.25 but have better peak horse power with the 2.5. I have no numbers to base this on.. just what my gut instinct says. Who knows I may even have that backwards LOL

What you can do for a easy check.. find out what size the pipe is of a stock Ford Probe GT is or the MX-6. For the K8.. its 2 inch.. so one size up should be plenty assuming you are going with a high flow muffler and cat as well. I tend to go up 1 step at a time when doing performance exaust on these smaller engines. Too big may actually hurt more than too small. I definately wouldnt go bigger than 2.5 on the ZE or DE unless boosting.

Tunes67
"So long.. and thanks for all the fish!" "Momma says VW Bugs are the devil" "This one time at band camp.. I stuck a flute in my Throttle Body" ;)
"Screw you guys.. I am goin home"

I am the Cranky God of Mods!!! Tremble before my fury!! LOL
User avatar
PATDIESEL
Senior Member
Posts: 4476
Joined: August 13th, 2001, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Atlanta, GA.

Post by PATDIESEL »

Tunes is right, the 2 1/4 is better for the K8 for the reason he stated. The tq and HP stuff he posted for the DE or ZE is also correct. I've seen dyno proof on other forums that correlates- more HP for a larger pipe, but a tad less tq. If dragging is your interest I would get better motor mounts to help with wheel hop and consider some urethane bushings. Sway bars, struts ard springs will help, but will do more for a track driven car than a drag car.
10 hp gain from a ECU flash seems high to me and I've heard they are not really going to give that much HP. It might be a best case senerio, but the average car with average mods will not get quite that much. Also, 10 HP is not enough in a drag race to mean much. A short shifter, better launch and other things will imporve your times alot more than 10 HP will.
Image
ZE -strait neck,headers,2.5 exhaust,pheno spacers,lower cross member,GC coils,MS struts,Brembo slotted rotors,filled MS mounts,SS brake/clutch lines, CAI,to rear bat reloc,Hella headlamps,Hella DE fogs 180WHP
PurpleDinosaur
Regular Member
Posts: 148
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 1:09 pm
Location: Detroit 'burbs

Post by PurpleDinosaur »

More sage advice fromthe masters... I am not worthy [/wayne]

Thanks!


-Barney
93 GS SE
nope-mx3
Regular Member
Posts: 1590
Joined: December 1st, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by nope-mx3 »

I had 2.5" on my K8, loud as he...
Installed the SS Headers, and got a 2 1/4" exhaust fitted at the same time, much better. pulls more evenly, and a lot less noisy.

-n
:: 2001 Mazda Mx-5 Sport // 2013 Volvo V40 D2 Momentum ::
Post Reply

Return to “Engine Electronics/Tuning”