MX-3.com

I was looking at this thing on yahoo, I cant understand why a luxury sports car has less options then my dads 2003 Avalon. I mean you pay 90,000USD and get some ****ty tape deck in it? I dont know I just thought that was a little on the retarded side. <p>http://autos.yahoo.com/newcars/details/acura03nsx/304speedat/trim_photos.html?refsrc=onnetwork/eastmantle

I don't get the tape deck either, kinda wierd. The car is quite overpriced, and I wish they would make a model with manual everything, no luxury items whatsoever. This is where the new Z car fell short IMO too. Too many gadgets that added up in weight to make the car about 450 or so lbs. to heavy. True sports cars needn't be so luxurious. What happened to making true sports cars, like the FD's and old Z cars. I wanna see a car made like that again.<p>[ July 22, 2003: Message edited by: 992mmx3 ]</p>

the NSX is a garbage car. Waste of money IMO.

yeah but do you see where all the weight savings and no luxury items sent those 2 cars? they quit making them. i agree with what ya sayin but they are looking at it as whats gonna make them buy this.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by natural born honda killer:
yeah but do you see where all the weight savings and no luxury items sent those 2 cars? they quit making them. i agree with what ya sayin but they are looking at it as whats gonna make them buy this.<hr></blockquote><p>
Thats exactly what sucks about todays cars, everyone wants the bling, noone cares about real performance, d'oh.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by johnnyb:
the NSX is a garbage car. Waste of money IMO.<hr></blockquote><p>And the MX-3 is sooo much better. You have no idea of what a mid-ship car is all about.