Question about intake mani options

V6 Technical/Performance Discussions
User avatar
SuperK
Supporting Member
Posts: 3774
Joined: July 27th, 2006, 8:09 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by SuperK »

the 323 KLZE with ITB's is incredible, if you've seen his 11 second 1/4 mile times.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-3A_dbEmHM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWzCAkaa ... re=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hHNu0hM ... re=related

The only thing is ruining the looks of your car with the ITB's sticking outta your hood. :( Other than that it's amazing!
Bane
'93 Mazda MX-3 ZE
Image
She Hates Me
My For Sale Thread
My Feedback Thread
My GS Worklog Thread
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5203
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by MrMazda92 »

http://www.xtremethings.com/CF_Cross-Ram.htm

Scroll to the bottom of this page for some custom stuff. If you're serious about this, I have some suggestions from Michael Perry himself for a project I'm considering myself...
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T - Stroker (Fully Counterweighted), Magnuson 2650 blower (7 PSI), Skip-Shift/CDV deleted, StopTech ST60 front brakes, Hellcat rear cradle, 2 piece DS. 6 speed, 3.9 LSD, 18" wheels - 510 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MS/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
User avatar
fowljesse
Supporting Member
Posts: 5676
Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
Location: portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by fowljesse »

I go off the forums for a bit, and everyone forgets my car :crying:
I have a mildly ported/ port matched G4 on a DE from a '95 Probe, with ZE intake cams, and it makes more power than the ZEs I Dyno'd with. I carefully port matched everything, and... well.. did a lot of other things ;) The point is: it's a DE that makes more power than ZEs with about the same amount of miles on them. It is also still untuned. I tuned it the best I could, but am not good with computers, so no datalogging.. just easy tuning.
So, if you port/ match a G4, and set the VRIS points at the right places, you will make power. It seems to be the best N/A option, unless you're really good at tuning ITBs.
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
User avatar
_-Night-Shade-_
Senior Member
Posts: 2664
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by _-Night-Shade-_ »

fowljesse wrote:I go off the forums for a bit, and everyone forgets my car :crying:
I have a mildly ported/ port matched G4 on a DE from a '95 Probe, with ZE intake cams, and it makes more power than the ZEs I Dyno'd with. I carefully port matched everything, and... well.. did a lot of other things ;) The point is: it's a DE that makes more power than ZEs with about the same amount of miles on them. It is also still untuned. I tuned it the best I could, but am not good with computers, so no datalogging.. just easy tuning.
So, if you port/ match a G4, and set the VRIS points at the right places, you will make power. It seems to be the best N/A option, unless you're really good at tuning ITBs.
You always skew this. You have so much work done to it including MS, headwork, and a bunch of bolt ons. Obviously it's gonna make more than a stock ZE. Imagine the power a ZE would make with all the work you put into your DE.
--------------------------------------------
[WORKLOG] [FOR SALE] [Wishlist] [Feedback]
User avatar
marcdh
Regular Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: July 26th, 2006, 3:54 pm
Location: Belfast -Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by marcdh »

To be fair I think Jesse was up against one of mooneggs (also with bolt ons) and another that I can't remember.
AZ-3 1498cc Turbo! EVO 8 turbo and manifold, 5 stud swap, SSR Type C, DIYPNP seq Megasquirt
Mx-3 2.5 V6 Turbo 291 BHP 251 lbft @ 8psi - Retired due to rust and back at uni
View Worklog
Image
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by Josh »

Well that's the way my B6DE was against other turbo N/A BP's and BPT's, running the same turbo setup...

I think the G4 IM is going to be the best bolt on option. With me running DE tuning anyways it will probably be the better option. It is easy to port match it so I am not worried about that. If I was planning on boosting soon then a Log type would be the way to go.

From what reading I could find last night, it seems that there are some decent HP gains to be had from the G4 with a slight loss in tq, but I could only find hp numbers for a guy who had a full port and polish job.
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11213
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

_-Night-Shade-_ wrote:You always skew this. You have so much work done to it including MS, headwork, and a bunch of bolt ons. Obviously it's gonna make more than a stock ZE. Imagine the power a ZE would make with all the work you put into your DE.
Pretty much, the only thing he's missing is the compression and the exhaust cams, but I'm wondering how much of a diff those cams would make anyway, if they were different.
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5203
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by MrMazda92 »

ZE heads are limited by their porting to begin with, and therefor will never have the potential for improvement that DE heads will. Shape > Size for porting, bigger isn't always better guys. It's been proven time and time again on ProbeTalk(Michael Perry has a 20 something page thread on this exact topic).

Yes, stock ZE heads beat out stock DE heads. Beyond that, like anything else you modify, the type and quality of the work is what decides the final result. I've never understood the "ZE" purist view... If you aren't planning to have your heads machined, and want to make power, buy ZE heads. If you are planning to have your heads ported and would like to get the most out of the porting, buy DE heads.

From a CR standpoint, 10:1 will make more power than 9.2:1 or 9.5:1, assuming all other factors are equal. This you all know, I just wanted to cover all my bases on this. :lol:

Back on topic, I'm still debating using the G4 manifold or my Straight-neck. My only hesitation for the straight-neck is that I'm not wanting to square out the ports on my DE heads, as the D shape limits the angle and size of the intake ports. :(
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T - Stroker (Fully Counterweighted), Magnuson 2650 blower (7 PSI), Skip-Shift/CDV deleted, StopTech ST60 front brakes, Hellcat rear cradle, 2 piece DS. 6 speed, 3.9 LSD, 18" wheels - 510 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MS/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by Josh »

MrMazda92 wrote: Back on topic, I'm still debating using the G4 manifold or my Straight-neck. My only hesitation for the straight-neck is that I'm not wanting to square out the ports on my DE heads, as the D shape limits the angle and size of the intake ports. :(
The Probe, mx-6, and 626 guys dont seem to mind it. it increases performance over the DE IM with the ports being different shapes. You could have some one weld up the corners and reshape the IM. but if you are running DE heads I think the G4 is going to be the better choice.

I have dyno sheets from when my car was dyno'd with the setup it has now, My plan is to find a decently priced G4, reshape the ports and redyno it to see if there are really advantages.
User avatar
fowljesse
Supporting Member
Posts: 5676
Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
Location: portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by fowljesse »

I believe the playing field was equal, in my case. I dyno'd with Mooneggs, and Stereoking15. Both of them have bolt ons, and Stereoking has a custom dyno tuned intake. They both have done about everything they could for power, including flashed ECUs which are probably tuned better than my MS guesswork, headers, etc...
I was only offering my opinion about the G4. Take it or leave it :shrug:
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
User avatar
Mooneggs
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6128
Joined: August 10th, 2005, 10:08 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by Mooneggs »

fowljesse wrote:I believe the playing field was equal, in my case. I dyno'd with Mooneggs, and Stereoking15. Both of them have bolt ons, and Stereoking has a custom dyno tuned intake. They both have done about everything they could for power, including flashed ECUs which are probably tuned better than my MS guesswork, headers, etc...
I was only offering my opinion about the G4. Take it or leave it :shrug:
Pretty sure stereoking15 just has a gutted IM with the VRIS tied open... :shrug:

I believe that even with your MS guesswork it is still good for 15-20 more hp over a probinator... :shrug: but for the record I still had more torque than you :mrgreen:

Here's the thread: http://www.mx-3.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=70104
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5203
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by MrMazda92 »

Josh wrote:The Probe, mx-6, and 626 guys dont seem to mind it. it increases performance over the DE IM with the ports being different shapes. You could have some one weld up the corners and reshape the IM. but if you are running DE heads I think the G4 is going to be the better choice.

I have dyno sheets from when my car was dyno'd with the setup it has now, My plan is to find a decently priced G4, reshape the ports and redyno it to see if there are really advantages.
It's true that they make more power with it, but it's more likely that the increased SIZE of the port is the cause, not so much the shape... I'm definitely not an expert, and this IS all second hand information I'm quoting. I'll say that right off the bat, but I do believe the information to be sound, as a great deal of it came from Michael Perry.

Oval ports roughly the same size as D shaped ports should make better power, especially if the angle of the port better compliments the combustion chamber design.
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T - Stroker (Fully Counterweighted), Magnuson 2650 blower (7 PSI), Skip-Shift/CDV deleted, StopTech ST60 front brakes, Hellcat rear cradle, 2 piece DS. 6 speed, 3.9 LSD, 18" wheels - 510 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MS/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
User avatar
marcdh
Regular Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: July 26th, 2006, 3:54 pm
Location: Belfast -Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by marcdh »

Whilst I appreciate the theory of round vs square I still always take proven in application over theory. As far as I know one of the most successful NA KLs known around these forums is Leo 323s:
leo323

yes my heads are stock ZE only mild clean up and shaved no porting or polishing heads last dyno was 273 someone here knows how much de or ze heads flow on a bench ...
__________________
new record 11.20 a 120 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I suppose you could argue with the same cams, CR, iTbs, exhaust and rpm DE heads, ported may be superior. I think it goes to show ZE ports are certainly not the worst limiting factor. I think 75 over without real porting is brilliant!
AZ-3 1498cc Turbo! EVO 8 turbo and manifold, 5 stud swap, SSR Type C, DIYPNP seq Megasquirt
Mx-3 2.5 V6 Turbo 291 BHP 251 lbft @ 8psi - Retired due to rust and back at uni
View Worklog
Image
User avatar
_-Night-Shade-_
Senior Member
Posts: 2664
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by _-Night-Shade-_ »

marcdh wrote:Whilst I appreciate the theory of round vs square I still always take proven in application over theory. As far as I know one of the most successful NA KLs known around these forums is Leo 323s:
leo323

yes my heads are stock ZE only mild clean up and shaved no porting or polishing heads last dyno was 273 someone here knows how much de or ze heads flow on a bench ...
__________________
new record 11.20 a 120 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I suppose you could argue with the same cams, CR, iTbs, exhaust and rpm DE heads, ported may be superior. I think it goes to show ZE ports are certainly not the worst limiting factor. I think 75 over without real porting is brilliant!
+1 Things don't always work in practice like they should in theory

OWN3D!
--------------------------------------------
[WORKLOG] [FOR SALE] [Wishlist] [Feedback]
User avatar
marcdh
Regular Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: July 26th, 2006, 3:54 pm
Location: Belfast -Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Question about intake mani options

Post by marcdh »

Haha I'm not trying to own anyone. I think Michael's pretty reliable too, I used his guide on porting when I first rebuilt my ZE and had the heads off.
AZ-3 1498cc Turbo! EVO 8 turbo and manifold, 5 stud swap, SSR Type C, DIYPNP seq Megasquirt
Mx-3 2.5 V6 Turbo 291 BHP 251 lbft @ 8psi - Retired due to rust and back at uni
View Worklog
Image
Post Reply

Return to “V6 Technical/Performance”