Upgrade For Fuel Pump (KLZE)

V6 Technical/Performance Discussions
lakersfan1
Senior Member
Posts: 3825
Joined: June 26th, 2003, 2:01 am
Location: Puyallup, WA

Post by lakersfan1 »

Slammed6 wrote:I always tell everyone, you WILL notice a difference when changing the fuel pump on a N/A car. I noticed on both my MX-6 and MX-3 the car seemed to react better when open her up.
If there were issues with fueling, we'd see lean or at least near stoich conditions when people do wideband readings when they dyno. All I've seen is still all rich readings on everyone's dyno wideband graphs. :shrug:
Slammed6
Regular Member
Posts: 965
Joined: January 14th, 2005, 5:34 am
Location: Oxnard, California

Post by Slammed6 »

OK, if you think a fuel pump is a waste of money than thats ur decision.

My decision is to upgrade, your car will have better throttle response. Its worth it. :thup:
User avatar
bmwm3guy
Regular Member
Posts: 1066
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Gatineau, QC
Contact:

Post by bmwm3guy »

theres actually a great discussion on ProbeTalk about this that I was reading the other day...

it seems that many people think that the 255 is way overkill unless you're going Turbo/Super.. The 190 doesnt work as hard, makes less noise, and uses less power from your engine. Technically, the 255 would be taking more power away from your engine than a 190, and since the 190 is already sufficient, the power lost using the 255 is easily avoidable and not necessary.
lakersfan1
Senior Member
Posts: 3825
Joined: June 26th, 2003, 2:01 am
Location: Puyallup, WA

Post by lakersfan1 »

They're electrically driven. How do you loose power using a 255 over a 190?
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

Honnestly John, I don't remember the number, the the pump i ordered was teh 255LPH for an Mx-6, I don't remember the exact number, it's been a few months, but I'll try to find the number on the reciept when I go home tomorrow, but I believe it's GSS317-400-730. I didn't get no installation kit, just the pump itself.

Honnestly, I don't head the pump at all and for morew power, if it's because of current drain, well, I have dual Optima red tops, so that's not an issue :D
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
bmwm3guy
Regular Member
Posts: 1066
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Gatineau, QC
Contact:

Post by bmwm3guy »

Nd4SpdSe wrote: if it's because of current drain, well, I have dual Optima red tops, so that's not an issue :D
then you need not worry.. thats what I was talking about was current drain from your alternator. MX3's are already notoriously weak for amps.
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

90amps is weak?
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
slowmx3
Regular Member
Posts: 161
Joined: August 19th, 2005, 1:40 am

Post by slowmx3 »

i just added a 255 to mine, and can't tell a frickin' differance. I needed one though cause mine was pooped.... i don't replace with stock though thats just me!
1992 mx-3, a couple mods, i'm still a n00b
---Don't try and church your car up, MX-3's aren't fast---
Post Reply

Return to “V6 Technical/Performance”