Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » December 9th, 2003, 11:35 am

Hello

I have managed to track down a 93 mx-3 v6 special edition. It has only 117.000km and runs well..Car fax check out good and mechanical inspection is very good, compression is between 175 and 178 on all 6 cylinders. I negotiated it down to $5500 cdn. Is this good? Interior exterior is immac.

Sonicxtacy02 · Post by **Sonicxtacy02** » December 9th, 2003, 11:42 am

sounds like a great deal to me...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » December 9th, 2003, 12:06 pm

Marvellous!! Also its a 5 speed manual transmission. Are u sure its a good deal? Are these cars any good? The other choice I have is a sunfire gt which looks very similar to the mx-3. But its a 4 cyl but feels peppy. Which is a better choice?

Manach · Post by **Manach** » December 9th, 2003, 12:24 pm

Originally posted by Gully Guyfun:
Marvellous!! Also its a 5 speed manual transmission. Are u sure its a good deal? Are these cars any good? The other choice I have is a sunfire gt which looks very similar to the mx-3. But its a 4 cyl but feels peppy. Which is a better choice?

One of my friend seeks a Mx-3 with a 4 bangers in it, as I proove what my car can do, and his (a Sunfire 1995) can't.. The V6 is peppy, pretty good, and got a suspension bar as default.

You'll have a blast!

And, well, if you want more power after that.. now we know what you can drop in to feel your need..

Guest · Post by **Guest** » December 9th, 2003, 1:36 pm

ok so its a 1.8l v6...I just picked it up. I love it. So now i need to save up fpr a k8 and get that 200hp when my motor wears out

Sonicxtacy02 · Post by **Sonicxtacy02** » December 9th, 2003, 1:42 pm

k8 is your stock engine.. you're shooting for a KL-ZE

johnnyb · Post by **johnnyb** » December 9th, 2003, 5:26 pm

The mx is a better looking car than the sunflower IMO

curtklze · Post by **curtklze** » December 9th, 2003, 10:55 pm

MX-3 is 1000 times better than a sunfire. the GM 2.2L 4 cylinder is one of the worst engines ever made, they always break down, the breaks are crap, they have problems with the rear breakes alot, the water pumps go on them ,the A/C system breaks down alot, , the shifter is sloppy, the engine is noisy and harsh, the seats fabric and side bolsters wear out quickly, the fuel pumps fail and the cars dont hold their value,.

The GT has a 2.3 L 4 cyl which is better than the 2.2, its got good power, but the rest of the cars problems are sill present.

<small>[ December 09, 2003, 09:59 PM: Message edited by: curtklze ]</small>

mitmaks · Post by **mitmaks** » December 9th, 2003, 11:34 pm

ive got '99s10 and engine in that thing is nice, and ive read reviews of people that owned them with 2.2l engine and it goes long way.

MX-3.com

Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?

Re: Buying a wicked mx3 or not?