strut tower bars?

This forum is for Discussion on Suspension issues.
Post Reply
lefthandedgod
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: March 26th, 2007, 10:41 am

strut tower bars?

Post by lefthandedgod »

Just curious.....Are the Corksport bars worth $130 more than the ebay ones? Just want to make sure that the ebay ones aren't made from swing-set tubing

Thanks!

Ben
bawolvesfan
Junior Member
Posts: 27
Joined: September 5th, 2006, 5:30 pm

Post by bawolvesfan »

my ebay ones are very nice, id just get those
User avatar
Mooneggs
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6128
Joined: August 10th, 2005, 10:08 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Contact:

Post by Mooneggs »

wikipedia wrote:A strut bar or strut brace is a mostly aftermarket car suspension accessory used in conjunction with MacPherson struts on monocoque or unibody chassis to provide extra strength between the strut towers.

With a MacPherson strut suspension system where the spring and shock absorber are combined in the one suspension unit, the entire vertical suspension load is transmitted to the top of the vehicle's strut tower, unlike a double wishbone suspension where the spring and shock absorber may share the load separately. In general terms, a strut tower in a monocoque chassis is a reinforced portion of the inner wheel well and is not necessarily directly connected to the main chassis rails. For this reason there is inherent flex within the strut towers relative to the chassis rails.

A strut bar is designed to reduce this strut tower flex by tying two parallel strut towers together. This transmits the load of each strut tower during cornering via tension and compression of the strut bar which shares the load between both towers and reduces chassis flex.
On the Saab Sonett mk2 and mk3 the overflow container for the cooling system doubles as a strut bar.

Performance: Resulting from the improved chassis rigidity (similar to that gained from a lower tie bar); may be improved steering precision under high load conditions (cornering and braking). Reduced understeer, tire wear and metal fatigue in the strut tower area may also be experienced.

Following the aftermarket's lead, some manufacturers have started fitting strut bars to performance models, including the Nissan Skyline, Mazda RX-8, Acura CL Type-S, BMW e46 M3 CSL, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, Toyota MR2 SW20 and the Holden VY II Commodore, as standard equipment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strut_bar

I don't think it would matter what kind it is....
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

I would think the Corksport bars are stronger, they are about 3x as big so I woul probably do a better job. I got the Corksports right away...but I have read in the past of people who have tried both and noticed an inprovement with the Corksport bar over the generic type.
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
solo_ryder
Senior Member
Posts: 6289
Joined: October 16th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: British Columbia

Post by solo_ryder »

Hmm, I have heard mixed opinions about this, IMO the corksport bars or any square bar is better then the round... unless it is solid. The eBay bars and the like have that screw in type design with the pivot point near the attachement (uses a allen key to tighten) that to me is a weak point. The corksport bars are more solid, but the cost more. Plus, the round bars don't fit so well on the ZE. I have a rear round bar but I have yet to install it.
Post Reply

Return to “Suspension/Brakes/Wheels/Tires”