Which one is faster?

General Mazda MX-3 Discussions
User avatar
babyblueMX3
Supporting Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: February 23rd, 2003, 2:01 am
Location: Gatineau,Quebec,Canada
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by babyblueMX3 »

Originally posted by seneca:
Now are we talking stock BPT and stock ZE? Cause there are a few klzeT's out there...or in the works *cough*BabyBluemx3*cough*. I'd put my money on a well turbo'd klze.
agreed :D

btw..did you get lost from your way back home?
RIP 400whp ZE-T MX-3
Current car : Golf 01 GTI 1.8T (15 psi)
seneca
Regular Member
Posts: 554
Joined: January 3rd, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by seneca »

Nah...almost ran outta gaz tho! :D Not hard at all...althought all the signs were backwards ;) You were right btw...I love the sound of the new exaust.

How are things going with the mounts? Have you had o pull out the grinder yet? :p

Tyson
My Car Domain Page:
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/496099

Take a Look, leave a comment, and don't forget to vote.
Ma-Ze
Regular Member
Posts: 53
Joined: July 20th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by Ma-Ze »

I would win.
:D
92 MX-3 RS,
Racing Mazda turbo kit. 451 WHP @ 25 psi
12.1 @ 117 mph w/318whp
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/652555
User avatar
babyblueMX3
Supporting Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: February 23rd, 2003, 2:01 am
Location: Gatineau,Quebec,Canada
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by babyblueMX3 »

Originally posted by seneca:

How are things going with the mounts? Have you had o pull out the grinder yet? :p

Tyson
no we figured it all out before we even got to the grinder :welder:
RIP 400whp ZE-T MX-3
Current car : Golf 01 GTI 1.8T (15 psi)
Gro Harlem
Senior Member
Posts: 3391
Joined: November 30th, 2001, 2:01 am
Location: Stuttgart, Deutschland
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by Gro Harlem »

I know from experience that the BPT would DESTROY the KLZE.

I've driven 3 different BPT Protege's, most of which were mostly stock boost & had nothing more than an exhaust.

I've driven two KLZE MX3's, one of which is mine. On stock boost, it'd be a close race, but with minor IC/exhaust & upping the boost to about 10psi there is no question that the BPT would destroy any KLZE powered MX3
Noble Green Metallic 93' GS Hybrid, 91' 1.8 323
DONATE TO MX-3.COM
mx3man83
Regular Member
Posts: 1921
Joined: August 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: tucson, az

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by mx3man83 »

6 out of 11 in the july drag board were k series powered mx-3's. Sure, the fastest is a 4 cylinder, but it has an incredible amount of modifications. I am on there with basically just a motor swap, intake and exhaust. Stock for stock, klze swapped mx-3 will take bp powered mx-3. Start modifying internals, playing with boost, etc, becomes a whole new ball game. I bet if someone had the financial ability to do as many modifications to a klze as some do to the four cylinders, the klze could create insane amounts of power, maybe even supra like.
Combat kit, Spectra blue paint, shaved, Black ADR flite 4 17's/ Yokahama ES 100's, straight through 2.5 inch cat back exhaust, CAI, Straight neck IM KLZE, poly filled motor mounts, Kl48/ Eprom chip, black altezzas, Wet Zex 75 shot, Walbro 255 fuel pump, Cosmo AFPR, GS SE all black interior, RF 1kbd amp, RF 12 HE2's (2), US acoustics 4 channel amp
My Cardomain site
User avatar
papa roached
Senior Member
Posts: 2761
Joined: December 10th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Montgomery, WVa

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by papa roached »

like i said, the BPT is the better and i wish i had gone 4 cyl but i already had a ton of parts when mine got wrecked so i got another GS
93 MX-3 GS (collecting parts for Eunos Presso conversion), 94 626 Transmission (4.10 gears), KL31 camed KL-ZE, Millenia intake, Millenia TB, SSAutochrome V2 headers, Magnaflow cat, 2 1/4 in pipe, Top Speed Pro 1 muffler, 9lb Fidanza Flywheel, ACT clutch, Corksport SS clutch line, Corksport SS brake lines, Unorthadox UDP, 255 lph fuel pump, HEI mod, ghetto-charger intake, KL36 ECU, SRD transverse crossmember bushings, SRD shifter extention bushing, SRD crossmember, Corksport bronzoil shifter bushings, Brembo Crossdrilled and Slotted rotors, 15 inch Konig Heliums, ZX-2 S/R struts, Eibach lowering springs, OEM front strut bar, Ebay rear strut bar, BFGoodrich G-Force T/A KDWs

Parts needing installed: turbo kit from BB (if i ever get it), 9.0:1 CR Diamond pistons, 4340 forged H beam rods, C/J-Spec spoiler, Nissan red tops in KL rails
http://www.cardomain.com/id/blazejeremy
hgallegos915
Senior Member
Posts: 6451
Joined: June 19th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: El Paso Tx U.S
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by hgallegos915 »

WOW so youyr daying my escort GT has more potential than my mx3 ..interesting ,, :D
-hec

MX-3 w/ curved neck millenia klde, boosted @ 5 psi. /bov and wastegate are good!/ nitto drag radial/ gutted interior/ millenia red top injectors, vortech fmu/aem wideband/ all bolts ons/ Car put together 100% by me. Mechanic? who needs a mechanic? ew.. real men work on their own cars!
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

Originally posted by Franko:
By the way I was looking around for his name and I happened to come across this fourm talking about our cars..
Take a look

I am going to murder somebody. Like, for example, all of these guys.
Posted by jOYRiDe:
theres a bad mx3 ive seen in some magazines with a 20b transplant...:devil:

mx3 with rotor engines are becoming common in australia
just recently, mazda released mx3s with factory turbos (i think for the aussie market only) which are faster then s2000's

<small>[ September 06, 2004, 07:44 PM: Message edited by: Nd4SpdSe ]</small>
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by Josh »

the KLZE is nice and ANY MOTOR with the rite mods has potential. but from a stock motor the BPT has alot more potential. im running the B6 W/turbo, although it has alot of mods. iv destroyed every Mustang GT in the area. but i just blew another tranny also. all in all its just a battle no one will win, unless we get a few out to the track and see what happens.

from what i heard the DE has alot more potential than the ZE being turbocharged due to the lower compression, it can handle alot more abuse.
mx3man83
Regular Member
Posts: 1921
Joined: August 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: tucson, az

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by mx3man83 »

No matter what anyone says, the klze has more potential than the bpt. First of all, there are bpt guys that put down more hp than me but their et's aren't as quick because their off boost power is pooo. The only thing holding back klze's is aftermarket support. Think about it. We have more displacement, more cylinders, but we just have less support. If someone had the cash to install custom rods, 8.5:1 pistons, sleeves, mike seli cams, double spring valves, port and polish, possibly bore and stroker kit, I believe the klze could be built up close to some supra engines. Also, our engines would have more off boost power than a four cylinder bpt. Lastly, our trannies, in stock form, would hold up way better than the four cylinder tranny.
Conclusion: Stock gtx bpt(180 hp) vs stock klze(197 hp), klze wins. For the money, the BPT has more potential to be built up. If time and money weren't an issue, klze all the way baby.

<small>[ September 06, 2004, 08:15 PM: Message edited by: mx3man83 ]</small>
Combat kit, Spectra blue paint, shaved, Black ADR flite 4 17's/ Yokahama ES 100's, straight through 2.5 inch cat back exhaust, CAI, Straight neck IM KLZE, poly filled motor mounts, Kl48/ Eprom chip, black altezzas, Wet Zex 75 shot, Walbro 255 fuel pump, Cosmo AFPR, GS SE all black interior, RF 1kbd amp, RF 12 HE2's (2), US acoustics 4 channel amp
My Cardomain site
User avatar
fry_81
Regular Member
Posts: 1898
Joined: April 22nd, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by fry_81 »

exactly, and this post isnt about how much work, time and money is involved in modifying the engines, just which one that fits in an mx3 would be faster. klze all the way. :2thumbsup:
1994 5spd GS Parts Car For Sale 800obo. e-mail for details. fry_81@hotmail.com
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by Josh »

Originally posted by mx3man83:
Conclusion: Stock gtx bpt(180 hp) vs stock klze(197 hp), klze wins. For the money, the BPT has more potential to be built up. If time and money weren't an issue, klze all the way baby.
yah too bad the bpt is lighter than the massive 2.5 which bearly fits in the engine bay, so the bpt would still win. thats why there is less support for for the KLZE and there is support for the BPT it has more potential. less weight same power. :)
im just screwing with ya. im just saying for less money the BPT is well worth it if you want a 12-13 sec car. i agree the KLZE would be better if given the proper mods were done. But the supra is a straight 6 and RWD. it is difficult to contain massive amounts of HP and torque in a FWD. it would be good for only one thing a straight line.
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11212
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

Weren't the B-Series made out of something heavier than aluminum?
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: Which one is faster?

Post by Josh »

yah the B-series is cast iron. which is heavy but still lighter then the 2.5. my 1.6 only weighs 160lbs with head manafold valve cover etc. i know cause i was going to ship an engine.
Post Reply

Return to “General Mazda MX-3”