Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » April 6th, 2004, 6:33 pm

Someone in this forum told me they only have 120. I thought they had more than that.
Is it true that V6 MX3s have 170ft Torque?

Nallboy · Post by **Nallboy** » April 6th, 2004, 6:37 pm

I think that would be the KL-ZE

mitmaks · Post by **mitmaks** » April 6th, 2004, 6:46 pm

did you read that it has 170tq or you "thought" cause thoughts arent always right lmao. its ~115tq

babyblueMX3 · Post by **babyblueMX3** » April 6th, 2004, 9:15 pm

and klze's are 160 of torque

Gro Harlem · Post by **Gro Harlem** » April 6th, 2004, 9:21 pm

omf! when is the idiocy going to end?

mitmaks · Post by **mitmaks** » April 6th, 2004, 11:47 pm

Originally posted by babyblueMX3:
and klze's are 160 of torque

its 195 tq i believe on klze

Nd4SpdSe · Post by **Nd4SpdSe** » April 7th, 2004, 12:22 am

I belive tq depends on if you have the Millenia or the Mx-6 cams

babyblueMX3 · Post by **babyblueMX3** » April 7th, 2004, 8:21 am

Originally posted by mitmaks:

Originally posted by babyblueMX3:
and klze's are 160 of torque
its 195 tq i believe on klze

nah i saw i dyno it wasn't near 195.....
and what Nd4SpdSe said is also true..

Nallboy · Post by **Nallboy** » April 7th, 2004, 11:30 am

Yeah I've seen tq range from ~160 to ~175 on the ZE. Depends on a few factors. But there's def. not that much in the stock V6.

Gro Harlem · Post by **Gro Harlem** » April 7th, 2004, 6:34 pm

KLZE makes 22.8 kg/m, converted that is about 164 ft/lbs at 5500rpm

Guest · Post by **Guest** » April 7th, 2004, 7:20 pm

I am talking about a 93 V6 MX3. Not no MX6 or 95 MX3. I just thought I would tell you guys this because someone told me that MX3s have 170ft Torque. Not 120!
Now can I get some comfirmation that my 93 MX3 has 170ft Torque?

killerpickle · Post by **killerpickle** » April 7th, 2004, 7:25 pm

no. It does not. Not even close. ALL stock v6 mazda mx3's have roughly 115 ft lbs of torque.

babyblueMX3 · Post by **babyblueMX3** » April 7th, 2004, 7:51 pm

there you go.....and I'm not sure where did you get the idea that 95 engines were different than the others

Nallboy · Post by **Nallboy** » April 7th, 2004, 10:49 pm

I don't know where you get your info, youngin, but it's not very good. The stock V6 is no different, and def. nowhere near 170 ftlb tq.

Gro Harlem · Post by **Gro Harlem** » April 7th, 2004, 11:05 pm

yup, how do you expect a engine that is rated at 130hp to make MORE torque when its got such a small displacement?

THe stock torque rating is 115 btw. The 2.5 KLZE doesn't even make 170 ft/lbs stock.

MX-3.com

Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?

Re: Wait a minute, I thought V6 MX3s had 170ft Torque!?